3v3ryth1ng**
______________________
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 3,941
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't think Ronda Rousey is as much of a "superstar" as she is being promoted as. First, I have never once seen a concrete number conclusively associated with her popularity. However, I do know that a common promotional tactic is to present the item as if it's already popular. Logically it wouldn't make sense that a relatively unknown competitor in an unpopular sport (WMMA) suddenly has numbers that rival Brock Lesnar's (a man who had worldwide exposure to a UFC target audience in WWE). I just don't believe these claims without some kind of proof, which has never been offered.
Second, she's not that good. She almost got neck cranked in her last fight. She always wins the same way, similar to Palhares. That's not a recipe for a long lasting champion. If anything, it's a symptom of a very shallow pool of competitors. Either way, she's no superstar.
Second, she's not that good. She almost got neck cranked in her last fight. She always wins the same way, similar to Palhares. That's not a recipe for a long lasting champion. If anything, it's a symptom of a very shallow pool of competitors. Either way, she's no superstar.