- Joined
- Jun 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,202
- Reaction score
- 991
Neither has any documented Amerindian blood.
The Rock is Samoan/Black/Irish.
Rikishi is Samoan/English.
1. Jordan tootoo
2. Alex pereira
3. Ricky Simon
4. A whole bunch of soccer players from central and South America.
do you guys agree with my list?
Just curious, what is European build to you? I don't a disagree or agree with you but im just curious by your definition.Poatan claims full-blood, but I'm not buying it. He has a European name, European build and his sister Aline Pereira looks ~75% European.
Just curious, what is European build to you? I don't a disagree or agree with you but im just curious by your definition.
Aldo & Jacare have very native features.
European build to me:
- Extremely tall.
Polynesians; possibly the most naturally muscular, broad-framed people on the planet
Only some europeans are tall... overall southern europeans aren't tall.
Europeans living in the USA aren't taller than african americans, despite better living conditions.
So there's a huge environmental factor.
Based on what ?
Most muscular is a bodybuilder thing : how many of them won Mr. Olympia ?
And "broad-framed" is way too vague : what does it mean ?
In my opinion, there are too many factors to have a reliable take on such things and it's always bro science.
Polynesians also store more bodyfat, which harms their bodybuilding potential.
Broad-framed = wide torso / convex rib cage.
A study that measured the heights of people across the world found that the top 17 countries with the tallest males were all European.
White American males average about 2cm taller than black American males.
Then they aren't more muscular according to your own words...
Ok but before that you talked about broad hips : women have proportionally broader hips than men, i guess you don't conclude they have a broader frame overall ?
Also in bodybuilding, nobody cares about how wide is your torso, but they do care about how broad are your shoulders.
I guess they don't have the same criteria than you...
It doesn't answer to the environmental question, so it's pointless.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinka_people : Roberts and Bainbridge reported the average height of 182.6 cm (5 ft 11.9 in) in a sample of 52 Dinka Agaar and 181.3 cm (5 ft 11.4 in) in 227 Dinka Ruweng measured in 1953–1954.
They were much taller than any male european on average at the same period. The only difference is that the living conditions got much better in european countries while possibly worse in many african countries.
Your own chart shows how important is the environmental factor :
Almost the same height for the younger generations, while white americans still have much better living conditions on average...
But i have much better data : https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_03/sr03-046-508.pdf
So the difference is less than 1cm overall and black men are taller on average at the 95th percentile...
All of that while being economically deprived, so i'm far from being convinced that europeans have any advantage regarding height, at least compared to some populations.
From your data; for 20-39 year olds, whites are taller across the board, including the 95th percentile.
Also, African-Americans are 24% European on average, so they aren't an accurate representation of West African genetics.
Latvians and Serbians are poorer than African Americans, but they're still much taller.
As for White Americans, none of the main genetic contributors to white America are among the top 10 tallest countries in Europe.
But on average, they aren't taller at the 95th percentile, despite being much more economically advantaged, once again...
It doesn't matter... if europeans are taller, then 100% europeans should be taller but they aren't... so it's pointless.
I don't think so and it's irrelevant anyway, what matters = blacks and whites living in the USA = similar environment.
And blacks and whites are the same height in the USA.
You assume it's genetic while you have no evidence to support your point.
I guess you didn't see these charts :
In 1955, the so-called tallest people on Earth were much smaller than the Dinka people : Roberts and Bainbridge reported the average height of 182.6 cm (5 ft 11.9 in) in a sample of 52 Dinka Agaar and 181.3 cm (5 ft 11.4 in) in 227 Dinka Ruweng measured in 1953–1954.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinka_people
Also, i already give you detailed data showing that, in a similar environment, whites are virtually the same height than blacks :
Also, where are those giant dutch people ? Give me some examples ?
The tallest players in the national dutch basketball team are "only" 6'9 : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_men's_national_basketball_team#Current_roster
I think one of the tallest dutch i've ever heard about is him : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rik_Smits
This guy is almost as tall while coming from a much smaller population and a much poorer country : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_John_Ramos
So to add to the overall picture, dutch people don't seem to peak at the most extreme heights, even compared to people coming from much smaller populations and poorer countries.
so we are actually genetically taller.
Basketball isn't remotely popular in the Netherlands yet they've still produced 2 NBA All-Stars; Nater and Smits.
It's like saying Americans must be small since they haven't produced any great rugby union players.
Still waiting for the evidence... i'm not saying you're wrong but i'm waiting for reliable evidence.