- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 27,240
- Reaction score
- 141
I hesitated to make this thread because I made a very similar one a few days before the last event involving different fighters, but I can't resist.
Holly is still a very good fighter, she's probably top 3 in the division even though I'm not sure about favoring her over Cat, but I'd think favor her over pretty much everyone else besides Miesha and she might still beat Ronda in a rematch although Ronda might be better overall.
Conor is still a very good fighter as well, it's harder to say where he would rank at LW since there are a lot of taller fighters he could possibly struggle with, but his striking is legit and he should be given credit for his run at FW. It's possible he could be a top LW in the future too.
The things that were truly exposed as overrated were the traits of speed and perceived 'athleticism'. Not that speed isn't an advantage, it is but many are overly quick to jump on the hype trains of speedy fighters (usually strikers since it's easier to demonstrate a speed advantage standing) and proclaim them near unbeatable gods as well as weighing speed too heavily in their judgment of the fighter's 'athleticism' when that actually consists of many physical attributes. Other examples -
Machida before quickly being derailed by Shogun
TJ Dillashaw who many ranked as top P4P after beating only ONE top fighter
Rose Namajunas being declared new Ronda Rousey before being schooled by Esparza
Pettis being hyped as near unbeatable by some
Joanna Champion being declared near unbeatable after only one title defense against Penne
what's starting to happen with Wonderboy now...
other 'fast' fighters whose trains were blown off the tracks even faster like Erick Silva and Thatch...
It seems like much of the fanbase is easily enthralled by a speedy or speed-based destruction of a good opponent(s) which may not be replicable against other opponents. Even Anderson whose run using his speed-reliant style actually stood the test of time couldn't repeat his Forrest performance against another 'slow' opponent in Weidman. Why is Gus considered that much better by most than Glover exactly? Gus did better against Jones yes, but that's the only piece of evidence considering Glover has never fought DC and Glover actually has better wins. Oh right Glover is too 'slow' to be an elite LHW... seems more and more like poor logic. Speed is not the main thing that separates merely 'good' fighters from great ones as some seemed to think.
Slow fighters rule (or at least shouldn't be considered second class citizens compared to fast fighters). RESPECT SLOWNESS.
Holly is still a very good fighter, she's probably top 3 in the division even though I'm not sure about favoring her over Cat, but I'd think favor her over pretty much everyone else besides Miesha and she might still beat Ronda in a rematch although Ronda might be better overall.
Conor is still a very good fighter as well, it's harder to say where he would rank at LW since there are a lot of taller fighters he could possibly struggle with, but his striking is legit and he should be given credit for his run at FW. It's possible he could be a top LW in the future too.
The things that were truly exposed as overrated were the traits of speed and perceived 'athleticism'. Not that speed isn't an advantage, it is but many are overly quick to jump on the hype trains of speedy fighters (usually strikers since it's easier to demonstrate a speed advantage standing) and proclaim them near unbeatable gods as well as weighing speed too heavily in their judgment of the fighter's 'athleticism' when that actually consists of many physical attributes. Other examples -
Machida before quickly being derailed by Shogun
TJ Dillashaw who many ranked as top P4P after beating only ONE top fighter
Rose Namajunas being declared new Ronda Rousey before being schooled by Esparza
Pettis being hyped as near unbeatable by some
Joanna Champion being declared near unbeatable after only one title defense against Penne
what's starting to happen with Wonderboy now...
other 'fast' fighters whose trains were blown off the tracks even faster like Erick Silva and Thatch...
It seems like much of the fanbase is easily enthralled by a speedy or speed-based destruction of a good opponent(s) which may not be replicable against other opponents. Even Anderson whose run using his speed-reliant style actually stood the test of time couldn't repeat his Forrest performance against another 'slow' opponent in Weidman. Why is Gus considered that much better by most than Glover exactly? Gus did better against Jones yes, but that's the only piece of evidence considering Glover has never fought DC and Glover actually has better wins. Oh right Glover is too 'slow' to be an elite LHW... seems more and more like poor logic. Speed is not the main thing that separates merely 'good' fighters from great ones as some seemed to think.
Slow fighters rule (or at least shouldn't be considered second class citizens compared to fast fighters). RESPECT SLOWNESS.