My post was a response to you accidentally stumbling on the logic underlying healthcare reform (I explained how that was). Your response starts petulantly and then sidesteps that logic. You ask why a quarter of the population doesn't understand the logic. Why do you think? People are not well-informed. Duh. A quarter of the population doesn't know who the vice president is.
And then you say I take the side of "leaches" (I'm assuming you mean leeches) on every issue, which is false. I've advocated higher taxes on inheritance and on passive income, for example. And then you talk about my "super cool open border plan," which doesn't exist. And given that we've discussed it before, it's not an honest mistake on your part. You're so flustered that I simply explained healthcare reform to you (and how your objection actually led you to the doorstep of understanding it) that you've chosen to try to change the subject with blatant lies (a frequent tendency of yours I've noted before--which suggests very poor upbringing). In fact, humorously, you advocated a much larger increase in immigration than I would (because you badly overestimated the current level).