- Joined
- Jan 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,563
- Reaction score
- 2,243
little more than 2 inches
I mean it's exactly what you describe, exploiting the current rule system. "Pretty" lifts have a more impressive ROM which involves more coordination of muscle groups and greater demonstration of over all power. Powerlifting as the name implies is supposed to be a competition of power.. not "who can stick their head in their own ass while moving a weight 2 inches".. You don't relate to the sentiment?
little more than 2 inches
Fantastic. I didn’t think I’d have to put something in my post specifically about that, but I guess I shouldn’t have underestimate you.
As long as the ass and traps are on the bench it's a legal lift. What changes are you proposing here? Change the rules to a flat back legs up bench?I mean it's exactly what you describe, exploiting the current rule system. "Pretty" lifts have a more impressive ROM which involves more coordination of muscle groups and greater demonstration of over all power. Powerlifting as the name implies is supposed to be a competition of power.. not "who can stick their head in their own ass while moving a weight 2 inches".. You don't relate to the sentiment?
The Bench world Record is near 735lbs or round abouts
The all-time bench world record is 337.5/744.
I guess it’s a good thing you’re not a judge.
What’s “stupid” about it?
He happens to be built in a way that allows him to exploit the current rules of the given sport to an extreme degree. What can you do?
Powerlifting isn’t a range of motion contest, it’s a move as much weight as possible while adhering to the rules contest.
There's a reason judges aren't looking at a single angle video of the lift on the internet. There's also a reason there are several of them.
Just because you can technically not break a rule doesn't mean it isn't going against the spirit of the contest. It's like it not being technically illegal for a 50 year old man to have a marry a 17 year old highschool girl, but it's still stupid.
Yeah, it's exactly like that. What a brilliant comparison.It's like it not being technically illegal for a 50 year old man to have a marry a 17 year old highschool girl, but it's still stupid.
Jesus Christ.
Yeah, it's exactly like that. What a brilliant comparison.
Spaghetti monster.
Is that not someone exploiting the rules of a given situation to do something that goes against the spirit whatever thing said rule is governing? What is technically legal doesn't mean it's following the spirit of the law. Just like an old man can technically follow the rules and marry a 17 year old high school girl he's known since she was a toddler, a powerlifter can bend himself in a way to make a 2" range of motion bench press that's technically following the rules of IPF of whatever federation he's in. Being technically right doesn't make you ethically or morally right.
There's a difference in using the rules in the spirit of competition as intended to gain a competitive advantage versus exploiting the rules to an absurd extreme that clearly was never intended. It's just pretty douchy when your only excuse for doing something is "the rules allow for it"
You’re on your own, @spdrew2143. I’m out lol.