- Joined
- May 31, 2018
- Messages
- 1,613
- Reaction score
- 2,505
It’ll be funny when it comes out the Paul brothers are not only KO’ing over the hill UFC guys but making more than them too. Sad.
It’ll be funny when it comes out the Paul brothers are not only KO’ing over the hill UFC guys but making more than them too. Sad.
It’ll be funny when it comes out the Paul brothers are not only KO’ing over the hill UFC guys but making more than them too. Sad.
Because to watch the fights they charge $70, and some of us are decent.Who cares? Why are you people so obsessed with this shit? Just watch the fucking fights. If the pay is bad they will go away to another promotion, but they are not going away, are they? Enjoy MMA and stop bitching ffs
Most major places historically did release purses, but that's been changing with UFC lobbying. Obviously, it doesn't matter if Iowa is or isn't releasing purses if Nevada isn't. The other issue is boxing promoters are required to turn over all side deals to the commission, where mma promoters do not. While that doesn't seem that significant, it's important in that it pretty much guarantees a leak to the media of overall pay. Which is something the UFC has fought for obvious reasons.This isn't a surprise, aren't like 3/4 of the purses not disclosed? Far as I know only a handful of commissions actually release them. And even then it is only what the commsiion holds for them, it very well couldn't even be the full agreed upon pay
The whole "mma is a free market, fighters can decide where to go" is predicated on employers and employees having equal information. Not disclosing purses is a big impediment to that competition since most fighters just don't know how little money they make in the big picture.Who cares? Why are you people so obsessed with this shit? Just watch the fucking fights. If the pay is bad they will go away to another promotion, but they are not going away, are they? Enjoy MMA and stop bitching ffs
Yeah, the reason is to make it as hard as possible for fighters to have the information that helps them negotiate and ultimately keep fighter pay down for promoters. Arguing fighter payouts are "trade secrets" is a really big stretch.He wouldn’t block it if there wasn’t a reason. Especially now since the Jake Paul vs Ben Askren numbers have been released.
and still got Reebok ones left. Tf are they complaining about pay?But do they get a Venom discount coupon...
51% offBut do they get a Venom discount coupon...
So tell us the pay for all the major boxing fights in 2021Most major places historically did release purses, but that's been changing with UFC lobbying. Obviously, it doesn't matter if Iowa is or isn't releasing purses if Nevada isn't. The other issue is boxing promoters are required to turn over all side deals to the commission, where mma promoters do not. While that doesn't seem that significant, it's important in that it pretty much guarantees a leak to the media of overall pay. Which is something the UFC has fought for obvious reasons.
The whole "mma is a free market, fighters can decide where to go" is predicated on employers and employees having equal information. Not disclosing purses is a big impediment to that competition since most fighters just don't know how little money they make in the big picture.
Which ones are you asking for? The bills that the UFC has lobbied for usually also benefit boxing promoters, if they want to take advantage of those loopholes.So tell us the pay for all the major boxing fights in 2021
By a long shot. Ben said just his base of $500k for the Paul fight was more than his entire Bellator career and more than any of his UFC fights.LOL the Pauls are making way more money than most UFC fighters.