- Joined
- Jun 1, 2002
- Messages
- 19,802
- Reaction score
- 9,217
Chael just made a video in which he said that the definition of P4P is simply who would win in a fight regardless of weight. I have heard this definition before. He argues that nobody should use the term to mean something else. But I think this is simply not how people generally use the term, including by Chael in the same video.
If the only question that matters is who would beat who, regardless of what weight class they are in, then of course Kongo, Kharitonov and Ryan Bader are higher P4P than Holloway, Khabib or Cejudo. The size difference is too big. Then the greatest P4P of all time are basically HWs or LHWs at best. Resume doesn't matter, by definition. GSP, DJ, even Silva, wouldn't cut it. Roy Nelson is under this definition higher than Demetrius. Roy Nelson higher than Amanda or Aldo. And so on.
But resume obviously does matter. The way it is used is more like: who is more accomplished relative to their weight and quality of competition overall. And in this regard it makes sense to say Amanda is higher P4P than Mark Hunt or whatever.
If the only question that matters is who would beat who, regardless of what weight class they are in, then of course Kongo, Kharitonov and Ryan Bader are higher P4P than Holloway, Khabib or Cejudo. The size difference is too big. Then the greatest P4P of all time are basically HWs or LHWs at best. Resume doesn't matter, by definition. GSP, DJ, even Silva, wouldn't cut it. Roy Nelson is under this definition higher than Demetrius. Roy Nelson higher than Amanda or Aldo. And so on.
But resume obviously does matter. The way it is used is more like: who is more accomplished relative to their weight and quality of competition overall. And in this regard it makes sense to say Amanda is higher P4P than Mark Hunt or whatever.
Last edited: