400m - 800m - 1 mile times Competition

[Curtis Gibbs]

No Whitebelts
someone else post rules

400 - 49 seconds
800 - 2:36
1 Mile - 5:55

 

[grrthetree]

I'd get in on this if I was allowed, I'm a fast runner and know I can beat your 800m time. Once I start running again I'll enter this, maybe that will coincide when I become an orange belt?

 

[hudday48]

I may be a white belt but I find your times pretty irregular. Thats a really fast 400m in comparison to your 800m. At least when I compare to my high school times.

400m 57
800m 2:10

Then in college
Never did one mile but did a two miler in 10:07

 

[ouboxer]

No Whitebelts
someone else post rules

400 - 49 seconds
800 - 2:36
1 Mile - 5:55

wow that a fast 400. thats a really good college track time. You should try competing in track meets in this race.

 

[vince89]

Thats an excellent 400m, good job. I would love to take part in this but I have shin splints at the moment

 

[erskine777]

what do you run the 100m in? Your 400 is beastly. You'd definitely win a bunch of college track meets.

 

[Curtis Gibbs]

mm, I'm a good sprinter but I fade off the longer the distance. I always come either first or second in 200m or 400m. Theres one kid in my city I'm friends with, but he can sometimes beat me We are kinda like rivals, and we are like half the track inhead of people.

 

[tri4ben]

To the OP, I either call work or you never ran the 800 or mile.

Someone who runs a 400 in 49 seconds will not say they ran 49, they will just come out an say something like 49.34 because they ran it in a meet with accutrack timing.

Also, if you were in shape to run a 49 second 400, you could have jogged an 800at least around 2:05 at the slowest. A comparable 800 time to a 49 second 400 is about 1:48 - 1:54 depending on how many miles you run per week.

 

[vince89]

Have you ever thought that maybe he set his 400m personal best at a time where he was in much better shape than at the time when he set his 800m record?

 

[Curtis Gibbs]

It was set at 49.xx I set it last year and cant remember the numbers. This year I started the 800 and 1 mile

 

[Ian Coe]

I don't know about my 800 time.

I'm doing some 800m intervals and know the 4th and last one was 3 min 5s, but I was pretty fucked at that point.

I did a 1.5 in 8 min 49 in feb, so thats 5 min 55 a mile

 

[rEdShawks]

No Whitebelts
someone else post rules

400 - 49 seconds
800 - 2:36
1 Mile - 5:55

ure 400 is preety damn good, your 800 is pretty good, and ure mile is average for a runner who 's been running for a couple years. still probbaly beats me in evry category, except maybe the 800

 

[rEdShawks]

To the OP, I either call work or you never ran the 800 or mile.

Someone who runs a 400 in 49 seconds will not say they ran 49, they will just come out an say something like 49.34 because they ran it in a meet with accutrack timing.

Also, if you were in shape to run a 49 second 400, you could have jogged an 800at least around 2:05 at the slowest. A comparable 800 time to a 49 second 400 is about 1:48 - 1:54 depending on how many miles you run per week.

i was thinking all of this

 

[rEdShawks]

I don't know about my 800 time.

I'm doing some 800m intervals and know the 4th and last one was 3 min 5s, but I was pretty fucked at that point.

I did a 1.5 in 8 min 49 in feb, so thats 5 min 55 a mile

thats pretty good, im hoping for a 9:30 in the 1.5

 

[Ian Coe]

thats pretty good, im hoping for a 9:30 in the 1.5

Well I was shocked when I finished and was told my time

I had gone from not training for months to early morning fasted sessions, 3 runs and a few swims and rows a week for 4 weeks before the test. The runs were untimed so when I was told I was below a 6 min mile I was chuffed.

Now when I'm back into the swing of things again I'm going to start timing my 1.5 and see how I do

 

[ThePitBull32]

I was a pretty good 800m runner back in high school. I ran 2 flat in practice, but in comp could never break 2:04.

 

[KazenoYojimbo]

Old times:
400m: 60s
800m: 2:11
1600m: 4:52

 

[rEdShawks]

Old times:
400m: 60s
800m: 2:11
1600m: 4:52

see these time make alot more sense even though the mile run is kinda slow compared to 4 and 8

 

[dragon_21]

Times from like 10 years ago

400m - 57s
800m - 2:09
1600m - 4:55

 

[rEdShawks]

Times from like 10 years ago

400m - 57s
800m - 2:09
1600m - 4:55

and now?? worse or better?