How much damage did the CM Punk signing do to UFC’s reputation?

TheSpider

Banned
Banned
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
6,195
Reaction score
15,988
“The ultimate proving ground where the best fight the best 3 times a year”

D654C2F0-E09E-41FD-A4EB-AD39FBC58047.jpeg
 
Showed pretty clearly not everyone can be in the UFC.
 
He got clobbered like everyone said he would, doesn’t hurt ufc at all. If anything it brought in some new fans
 
none. only on sherdog with the countless people on here who hate the ufc/mma but have thousands of posts talking about it
 
None because he waa fighting a nobody. Now if he was facing a ranoed opponent... That would be another story.
 
None, i would had hurt more if he had won a belt after a few fights, then run back to pro wrestling...like that other jacked white boy sherdog loves.
 
The UFC doesnt care about its image.

Their slogan is 'Don't fucking watch it then, ya goof'
 
It exposed the fact that they’re desperate for anyone that can draw.
 
It clearly didnt hurt UFC more than some "champions" failing numerous drug tests for PEDs.
 
tumblr_odd1xxgfPv1qd4esao1_500.gif
 

1 Cuban Missile and that's a whole different outcome; direct result of Duke Roufus' shit coaching and instruction.

ATT would have led Punk to the promised land.
 
Last edited:
Well after I measured the damage...

it came to 7%.
 
To the devoted ufc fans some, to the casuals none.
 
None. The majority of paying fans don't give a shit about roids, CMPunk or Jon Jones private life issues. They just wanna see great fights.
 
Back
Top