- Joined
- Jul 14, 2013
- Messages
- 10,887
- Reaction score
- 236
Exactly. Sh!ts not that serious...Sure, why not.
"But were semi-boring decision"He is a borderline case for me. He had a good career and beat some top guys, but even though he won the title, he never successfully defended it and never got it back. He beat some good fighters, but most were semi-boring decisions. His KO of Liddell was when Chuck was already on the down side of his career, as was his fights with Rampage and Tito. He being a HOF'er is OK with me, but if I was voting I would probably not vote him in.