Lol at getting RJJs timing down. Something no one ever did once during his prime yeara. The second Roy thinks Charles is a real threat, he turns it up and gets him out of there.Bunch of bullshit. RJJ used a boring safety first approach to outpoint Toney,Hopkins, and McCallum none of that razzle dazzle flash he did to B level fighters. If Ezzard fights Jones in a 15 rounder I struggle to see how he doesn't get RJJ timing and rhythm down well enough to hurt and finish Jones.
But none of them saw him ultimately. How can you say aguy in the sport's infancy had more skill than peak rjj....it isn't logical imho
In the 1900s prize fighting was in it's infancy. They just started seeing it as legit and keeping records around like 1880s. It was basically 1 step up from backyard wrestling in Langfords time.The sport wasn't necessarily in its infancy. It was considerably different than it is now, but prizefighting had existed for several decades before Langford. Many boxing historians will choose not to directly compare fighters from considerably different eras, though, and Langford and Jones did fight in very different eras. If that's how one wants to do it, within his own era, what Langford achieved was more remarkable than what Jones Jr.. achieved. There is a reason why many will talk about Langford in a way that only guys like Robinson, Greb, and Robinson tend to be talked about.
In that era dude played a professional basketball game a few hours before his title defense
In the 1900s prize fighting was in it's infancy. They just started seeing it as legit and keeping records around like 1880s. It was basically 1 step up from backyard wrestling in Langfords time.
What exactly did he achieve? Instead of just saying that, give me some accolades that will make me favor him over Jones.
Boxing historians are retarded. He's described as "James Toney with Tysons punching power"......pfff get the fuck out with that shit. People who never even saw him fight....absurd.
Ah, your comprehension of what has been written is challenged.Yes they would.
Plenty of people.
Ali could.
Frazier, Foreman, Wilder, Joshua, Klitschko, ETC...
All of those guys could beat 160-175lb Roy Jones. They'd have 40-80lbs on him.
Prime Roy beats Hagler in a decision, too slick, too good of an athlete, too fast on his feet, basically a better version of Sugar Ray Leonard with power to get your attention. Hagler tries to walk Roy down for most of the fight becasue that's what Hagler does. Roy slips in some sneaky lead rights and left hooks and gets out of there before Hagler can counter. Rinse and repeat all night, RJJ was very patient when he knew the other guy was dangerous.Hagler?
Meh....he was more fast than he was powerfulLet's not forget RJJ had HW power at MW
Speed generates powerMeh....he was more fast than he was powerful
That's a nice counterpunch post but....not really true.Speed generates power
Actually Floyd used to (look at his early fights); until his hand problems made him less of a volume puncher and more defensive. But that's OKThat's a nice counterpunch post but....not really true.
Floyd would have knocked people into the shadow realms if that were true.
Speed creates more opportunities for catching a blind spot....which will be impactful shots
Floyd did have solid power at 130 but he was hardly removing fools from consciousnessActually Floyd used to (look at his early fights); until his hand problems made him less of a volume puncher and more defensive.
Floyd did have solid power at 130 but he was hardly removing fools from consciousness
The problem is most of those are from work5600 posts since April?
The problem is most of those are from work