- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
- Messages
- 9,110
- Reaction score
- 26
You've never even seen Sam Langford fightGuys I think who can beat RJJ mostly at the 175 weight class.
Yet think.he can beat one of the 2 or 3 best talents of the past 30 years
K.
You've never even seen Sam Langford fightGuys I think who can beat RJJ mostly at the 175 weight class.
Decent point I am only going off boxing historians view of Langfords skill level. But what refutation do you have for the other boxers I mentioned?You've never even seen Sam Langford fight
Yet think.he can beat one of the 2 or 3 best talents of the past 30 years
K.
Boxing historians wouldn't put Langford in the same tier as RJJ....Decent point I am only going off boxing historians view of Langfords skill level. But what refutation do you have for the other boxers I mentioned?
The Cincinnati Cobra would have been a handful for anyone in his prime, including RJJ. That would be a super fight. Prime RJJ versus prime Ezzard Charles. Make it happen, Dana.Ezzard Charles
Ezzard was amazing, and his resume holds up, but technically proficient fighters couldn't handle RJJ. He defied logical boxing physics and laughed at fundamental soundness.Ezzard Charles is the greatest LHW fighter ever.
And yes he would beat Roy Jones.
He defied logical boxing physics and laughed at fundamental soundness.
Boxing casuals would remember when he was at his peak fame wise.A lot of boxing casuals write RJJ off because they just remember washed up RJJ taking all those losses. They don't remember the first 15 years of his career where he was basically untouchable.
On Jones absolute worst day and Canelo’s absolute best it’s possible he could sneak a decision in a very passive fight. Stranger upsets have happened in pro sports.
The problem is those rjj bad days never existed in his prime.
Bunch of bullshit. RJJ used a boring safety first approach to outpoint Toney,Hopkins, and McCallum none of that razzle dazzle flash he did to B level fighters. If Ezzard fights Jones in a 15 rounder I struggle to see how he doesn't get RJJ timing and rhythm down well enough to hurt and finish Jones.Ezzard was amazing, and his resume holds up, but technically proficient fighters couldn't handle RJJ. He defied logical boxing physics and laughed at fundamental soundness.
2001 RJJ could take on several elite guys at a time.
Boxing historians wouldn't put Langford in the same tier as RJJ....
That alone just honestly kinda mutes the conversation for me
Boxing casuals would remember when he was at his peak fame wise.
They wouldn't have watched him at a washed up stage....that'd defeat the entire argument of them being casuals in the first place
View attachment 676669
But none of them saw him ultimately. How can you say aguy in the sport's infancy had more skill than peak rjj....it isn't logical imhoInsofar as people try to compare drastically different eras, Langford tends to be more respected among boxing historians than Roy Jones Jr.