- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Messages
- 11,483
- Reaction score
- 10,377
He had already been suspended......
Yes I forgot he popped on getting to the UFC, but he looked mega juicy in his last fight (and was "roid raging" to boot).
He had already been suspended......
So you agree there's literally no evidence to base this on?lol at limiting it to before jon jones, as if there were any examples before jones......everyone after jones gets the same treatment.
gee, i wonder why there aren't alot of studies on the long term urinary excretion patterns of m3 metabolites from tbol ingestion.......
tell me, what is the "half life" of m3 and what is the detection window for m3? and why is the detection window magically increasing as the sensitivity of the testing increases? and what explains the actual detection patterns with fluctuations between low levels and undetectable levels with no other changes or substances present?
there have been studies showing a single low dose detectable for 8 months......and another showing detection from a single low dose 16 months later........
but yeah, a leading anti-doping org is just making things up in full public view for jon jones......
its funny. when it first came out people said "it's never happened with anyone else" so it's made up for jon. now we have lots of other examples its "well it never happened before jon"......as if these don't exist.....
Lol. Nice comeback.So you agree there's literally no evidence to base this on?
Cool. Could a saved yourself a lot of trouble and just said that, but you do you
Doesn't prove anything. You might as well be a flat Earther, since you have such a low standard of evidence to believe in something.It was just a picogram. What difference could it actually make?
Before USADA:
After USADA:
No they can’t.Jon Jones incident has set a bad precedent where any roider can get away
Because usada has policies?The ufc is an absolute joke.
I mean, it's not a scientific explanation if it's not confirmed.I continues to amuse me how people just willfully ignore the actual scientific explanation for this so they can go "hurt durr, they are one steroids".
But I guess it's not surprising. If the pandemic has taught is anything it's that alot of people are fucking dumb.
Its laughable that you think your post means anything to anyone without providing evidence to support your claim.lol. you have no idea what you are talking about. it's laughable.
Again, you’re ignorant on the topic and should just read and learn more before posting about it.Its laughable that you think your post means anything to anyone without providing evidence to support your claim.
Yup.....So USADA is consistent with how it treats pulsing in multiple fighters. And yet, Sherdog constantly moves the bar and claims conspiracy. Sounds about right.
Doesn't prove anything. You might as well be a flat Earther, since you have such a low standard of evidence to believe in something.
that 2nd pic screams steroids to you??
I have no reason to believe you're not the ignorant one.Again, you’re ignorant on the topic and should just read and learn more before posting about it.
So USADA is consistent with how it treats pulsing in multiple fighters. And yet, Sherdog constantly moves the bar and claims conspiracy. Sounds about right.
The science director for VADA (Catlin) has never seen micro dosing of Tbol and it likely isn’t effective (tbol is generally cycled in large doses for weeks at a time) and really makes no sense (micro dose a substance with a long detection window) and you still have the risk of other metabolites being present.So... what about the practise of micro-dosing? Could that explain pulsing?