15 out of 23 of Khabib's opponents don't even have a wikipedia entry

[lecter]

Just wanted to let that fact here since I feel this whole "He's unbeaten, he's 23-0 " is a bit blown out of proportion.

Also he said that "bums" like Nate Diaz lose a lot. Actually he doesn't lose as often as Khabib's opponents who have a combined record or 282-161 (136-103 pre UFC) opposite to Nate's 19-10.
That is while Nate Diaz is fighting in the UFC for 10 years or something (facing guys like Rory, Dong, Cowboy, Guillard in his prime, Henderson etrc) and most of Khabibs opponent mainly fighting in some tavern in Dagestan, some of them with negative records like 2-5, 0-1, 1-5, 3-6.

 

[raconnor]

15 out of 24*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear

 

[ortizgnp]

Posting for check ins and future laughs.


/ortizgnp

 

[sirmorbach]

15 out of 24*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear

9/10, I'll give you that.

 

[lecter]

15 out of 24*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear

That bear story is a myth, in that video he was fighting his girlfriend in Dagestan.

 

[nanika]

its still hard to crush cans and stay undefeated to be honest. esp early in a career when a fighter lacks experience in difficult situations. if it was easy there would be a bunch of undefeated fights but there isnt...

 

[CountOfSoCal]

He beat the current champ during the undefeated streak.

That's what matters, essentially.

 

[sethcab]

He beat the current champ ya goof

 

[in the liver]

more than half of conors wins are like that too


it made his fanbase quite upset when i pointed this out a while back <3

 

[Leinster Rugby]

I judge him on what he's done inside of the UFC, which is impressive

 

[ortizgnp]

Speaking of records.. I would fucking quit if I lost my debut and was 0-1.

People laugh at that kind of stuff.

Edit: But then again I would be 0-1 forever and that sucks too. Shit.
Edit 2: Nevermind..

 

[Arqueto]

Just wanted to let that fact here since I feel this whole "He's unbeaten, he's 23-0 " is a bit blown out of proportion.

Also he said that "bums" like Nate Diaz lose a lot. Actually he doesn't lose as often as Khabib's opponents who have a combined record or 282-161 (136-103 pre UFC) opposite to Nate's 19-10.
That is while Nate Diaz is fighting in the UFC for 10 years or something (facing guys like Rory, Dong, Cowboy, Guillard in his prime, Henderson etrc) and most of Khabibs opponent mainly fighting in some tavern in Dagestan, some of them with negative records like 2-5, 0-1, 1-5, 3-6.

They have no Tinder accounts or nudes posted from the fappening either.

 

[Doog Doogson]

This just in: Alleged MMA fan weighs in on fighter's legitimacy after a thorough 5 minute wikipedia research

 

[Drake]

 

[waldywaldy]

 

[lecter]

This just in: Alleged MMA fan weighs in on fighter's legitimacy after a thorough 5 minute wikipedia research

Nah I actually have a bot which checks those things in seconds but I won't share it so that I'm the only one who can make these genius threads and get all the likes and props.
Next week we'll take a look at McGregor's opponents stay tuned.

 

[WarKO]

Just wanted to let that fact here since I feel this whole "He's unbeaten, he's 23-0 " is a bit blown out of proportion.

Also he said that "bums" like Nate Diaz lose a lot. Actually he doesn't lose as often as Khabib's opponents who have a combined record or 282-161 (136-103 pre UFC) opposite to Nate's 19-10.
That is while Nate Diaz is fighting in the UFC for 10 years or something (facing guys like Rory, Dong, Cowboy, Guillard in his prime, Henderson etrc) and most of Khabibs opponent mainly fighting in some tavern in Dagestan, some of them with negative records like 2-5, 0-1, 1-5, 3-6.

I mean you are right but I'd also argue it's still pretty hard maintaining that number man.

Even in the amateurs.

There's guys that get cut from UFC and try to coast in Tier II & III promotions and they still lose here and there.

A lot can happen in MMA. It's not like boxing where guys go 50 undefeated. You do 3 in a row in MMA and you're on a streak and being talked about, that's how hard it is.

For you to go unbeaten, in any league, for long bouts, shows your outclassing your opponents and always on your game. Struve's also has a huge amateur record and it's blotched w losses.

So it is impressive.

 

[War Pig]

I watch him fight and he looks legit to me.

 

[Summoning]

Just wanted to let that fact here since I feel this whole "He's unbeaten, he's 23-0 " is a bit blown out of proportion.

Also he said that "bums" like Nate Diaz lose a lot. Actually he doesn't lose as often as Khabib's opponents who have a combined record or 282-161 (136-103 pre UFC) opposite to Nate's 19-10.
That is while Nate Diaz is fighting in the UFC for 10 years or something (facing guys like Rory, Dong, Cowboy, Guillard in his prime, Henderson etrc) and most of Khabibs opponent mainly fighting in some tavern in Dagestan, some of them with negative records like 2-5, 0-1, 1-5, 3-6.

 

[HI SCOTT NEWMAN]

well he did fight a lot of unknown fighters in Russia before. so its to be expected. but now in UFC he has had 7 fights and RDA was the only one who is anywhere near top level. the only other guy he fought who is a good fighter is Tibau, and he lost that fight. Don't care what judges say, he lost.