I thought I'd run this by the war room crew, today in my province a woman who killed a family of five (two parents and 3 children all under the age of 5) while drunk driving plead guilty and was sentenced to ten years minus time served (1 year). Everyone around here is completely outraged by the fact that if to claim to have a "disease" or "illness" when it comes to drinking your automatically considered an ill person who just couldn't help what they were doing rather then a murderer. I believe this woman deserves no less then ten years per victim. Sorry for the rant but please share your opinions
Too much future too fast brain explodeI would consider that one of the largest benifits of self driving cars. Car cant drive drunk. Thats 10,000 lives a year in the USA.
I'm on mobile so I can't post links but if you go to ctvnews.ca/regina it should show upCan we get a news report or something.... any sauce here at all?
I'd have to know the facts - 1. how drunk?, 2. first time or repeated offense?, 3. any other factors contributing to the accident?, 4. past criminal record?
Assuming a clean record, no priors, she fell asleep at the wheel and wasn't driving recklessly or speeding - my instinct would be to give her 5 5 year sentences to run consecutively (25 years) with potential release after 12 for good behavior. I firmly believe that the punishment for killing multiple people should be greater than the punishment for killing one person (that's part of the reason I am in favor of the death penalty).
I'm on mobile so I can't post links but if you go to ctvnews.ca/regina it should show up
I'm on mobile so I can't post links but if you go to ctvnews.ca/regina it should show up
I thought there were three kids apparently I miss read49 year old woman at 3x the legal limit. Speeding and ran a stop sign.
Not sure if she has any priors.
49 year old woman at 3x the legal limit. Speeding and ran a stop sign.
Not sure if she has any priors.
9999 this year.I would consider that one of the largest benifits of self driving cars. Car cant drive drunk. Thats 10,000 lives a year in the USA.
Canada sometimes gives as little as 3 years to rapists and pedophiles, and they don't even serve more than 2 years. You've literally got pedophiles abusing little girls and boys repeatedly for years and the courts give them 5 years, which they don't serve entirely. You're lucky she even got 10 years to begin with. Canada's laws are fucked up.
I thought I'd run this by the war room crew, today in my province a woman who killed a family of five (two parents and 3 children all under the age of 5) while drunk driving plead guilty and was sentenced to ten years minus time served (1 year). Everyone around here is completely outraged by the fact that if to claim to have a "disease" or "illness" when it comes to drinking your automatically considered an ill person who just couldn't help what they were doing rather then a murderer. I believe this woman deserves no less then ten years per victim. Sorry for the rant but please share your opinions
10 years is actually very good . Its one of the longer sentences for drunk driving causing death in Canada . But she wont spend 10 years in prison . So now ask yourself how much you are raging knowing she will likely not even serve half that before getting paroled .Is ten years fair?
Who ever said 9 months is actually spot on . She will likely serve about 9 months per victim .I honestly can't answer that, but I don't believe 2 years per victim is fair
I thought there were three kids apparently I miss read49 year old woman at 3x the legal limit. Speeding and ran a stop sign.
Not sure if she has any priors.
and that is truly disgustingWho ever said 9 months is actually spot on . She will likely serve about 9 months per victim .