- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,443
- Reaction score
- 0
Is it good? I have seen it scrolling by, but haven't watched any yet.Dirty Money. Its a docu-series. Valeant Pharmaceuticals is one of the episodes.
Is it good? I have seen it scrolling by, but haven't watched any yet.Dirty Money. Its a docu-series. Valeant Pharmaceuticals is one of the episodes.
I did that with Lockdown once.I once went on an American Greed watching bender that lasted longer than I care to admit
I would definitely recommend it. There is another docu-series that isn't as well done or compelling, but Dark Money was solid all the way through (there might have been one ep that wasn't that interesting, but I can't recall).Is it good? I have seen it scrolling by, but haven't watched any yet.
That's pretty uncommon for a sentence to get reduced on direct appeal unless the sentencing judge did something very unusual. Nothing to indicate that she did-its maybe a little over the recommended sentence for securities fraud/theft of that magnitude. If there is a challenge it'll probably be on the basis that he attempted to return funds before he got caught. But he was already being investigated at that point so it won't help much if at all.I bet it gets reduced upon appeal but still.... he's finally humbled, I guess.
I bet he's gonna meet lots of hard men in a place like
Shrelki has been in a maximum security prison ever since the judge revoked his bond last year. Dunno if he's returning there, but he's had a taste at least.It's basically a resort you can't leave is my understanding.
I did that with Lockdown once.
I'm pretty sure it's beyond sentencing guidelines. We'll seeThat's pretty uncommon for a sentence to get reduced on direct appeal unless the sentencing judge did something very unusual. Nothing to indicate that she did-its maybe a little over the recommended sentence for securities fraud/theft of that magnitude.
Shrelki has been in a maximum security prison ever since the judge revoked his bond last year. Dunno if he's returning there, but he's had a taste at least.
That's pretty uncommon for a sentence to get reduced on direct appeal unless the sentencing judge did something very unusual. Nothing to indicate that she did-its maybe a little over the recommended sentence for securities fraud/theft of that magnitude. If there is a challenge it'll probably be on the basis that he attempted to return funds before he got caught. But he was already being investigated at that point so it won't help much if at all.
Shrelki has been in a maximum security prison ever since the judge revoked his bond last year. Dunno if he's returning there, but he's had a taste at least.
7 years is within guidelines for an offense level of 27-28 without a criminal history.I'm pretty sure it's beyond sentencing guidelines. We'll see
He had to give that up. I'm not sure to whom though.
Nice to see the WR unite in condemnation of this scum bag. I wouldn't lose any sleep if karma gang raped him repeatedly. Fuck him.
Has he really done anything to warrant such a punishment, though?
From what I understand he swindled money out of rich people. That's about it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Shkreli
"In September 2015, Shkreli received widespread criticism when Turing obtained the manufacturing license for the antiparasiticdrug Daraprim and raised its price by a factor of 56 (from US$13.5 to US$750 per pill), leading him to be referred to as "the most hated man in America" and "Pharma Bro".[12][13][14][15][16][17]"
The government has itHe had to give that up. I'm not sure to whom though.
There was no loss to investors in the end, he paid them all back, they were made whole. So we shall see.7 years is within guidelines for an offense level of 27-28 without a criminal history.
The estimated loss of 10.5 million gets you to an offense level 26 or 27 on it's own under 2b1.1. (He doesnt get credit for making them whole because he didnt until people started asking questions.) At that point you're at most a month over the guidelines, so there's not much there. And because it's securities fraud there are a couple arguably applicable enhancements.
What's your basis for thinking it's over the guidelines (and the court abused it's discretion by going over the guidelines)?