Social ‘Disrespectful’: Google Employees Melt Down Over The Word ‘Family’

@tonni

Like this right here, not bad at all for the network and I think he actually does care about as much as any wealthy person could. It kind of goes off the rails with the marijuana diatribe and there are really basic things he's just woefully misinformed about like "manufacturing disappearing within a "generation" or some shit like that.



The folks that love him, absolutely no chill.

Bawz.png


Plot Twist Time:




sVp8K3Z.gif
 
@tonni

Like this right here, not bad at all for the network and I think he actually does care about as much as any wealthy person could. It kind of goes off the rails with the marijuana diatribe and there are really basic things he's just woefully misinformed about like "manufacturing disappearing within a "generation" or some shit like that.



The folks that love him, absolutely no chill.

Bawz.png


Plot Twist Time:




sVp8K3Z.gif


But,Butt,Butt,Buttt,butLGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.
LGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.LGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.WildLGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.ImamLGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.
 
I bet instead of clapping they quietly snap their fingers
 
But,Butt,Butt,Buttt,butLGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.
LGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.LGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.WildLGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.ImamLGBT,LGBTQ,LGBTBBQ,LGBTQ,LBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ,LGBTQ.

200.gif
 
Outside of things like checking the weather or conversion calculations (very basic things) I use duckduckgo for about everything.
Word man. Google is losing a lot of my clicks. Don't need their nonsense. Plus stop selling my data you evil corporation!
 
It would be absurd if it wasn't so destructive. I've wondered before whether or not falling into decadence and ultimately self destruction isn't just the natural order of things. Every empire / civilization carved from grit, blood and guts that becomes as big as the US (and GB, Rome, etc) and enjoys all the luxuries of power, technology and wealth that comes with it, seems to inevitably turn soft and begin to rot. Humans need a struggle, something to give their lives purpose beyond drudging away at the millstone and the empty hollow hedonism, robotic consumerism and instant gratification sought to hide from the fact that slaving away for a few sheckles is a fruitless endeavor of cosmic proportions.
But, honestly, I don't believe that it has to be that way at all. The human mind works in predictable patterns, ergo the phrase "history keeps repeating itself".
It doesn't have to, but here we are.
Dude this. We are like immune systems, if we have nothing to fight we get soft and find dumb stuff to fight over.
Every man needs to do MMA in high school and have to have a single fight per year. We're so soft it's sad. Kids are such wusses these days
 
I wonder why so many on the left don't want to have kids? Not everyone should, but I've noticed this to be more of a leftist thing.

Paul Washer is correct when he says:

...we are a culture that hates children. Four thousand, in my country, a day are aborted. They’re starting to build even restaurants that are child free. Resorts that are child free, condominiums-child free, don’t want any of those children around.

And we’re also a society that hates women. And you say, “Yea, those male chauvinist, they hate women.” No, women hate women. The people who hate women more than anybody else on this planet are feminist. They hate women; they want women to be men. They don’t want them to be women. And any woman who says, “I believe that it is my desire to be in my home, to raise godly children, to support my husband in the endeavors that he has to go through in order to provide for our family”, any woman who does that is considered a failure in our society; she’s looked down upon. And I know that from personal experience, I know the things that my wife has suffered. The things that people have said because, you know… they say, “Why don’t you help your husband?”

source: Recovering Biblical Womanhood
 
Outside of things like checking the weather or conversion calculations (very basic things) I use duckduckgo for about everything.

Juat a few days ago I switched over to their mobile browser. This thing is a godsend compared to Chrome and Brave.
 
Lol. Honestly, the initial whine reads like someone who is just deeply insecure about his lifestyle choices, and is bitterly trying to prevent others from reminding him of his failings.

Shame. How sad.
 
There are many on the Left that want to redefine "family"

Obviously these leftists at google hate the family as God designed it to be. Biological man as Father, biological female as mother, and children.
Don't forget the Dog.
 
Strange thing to get worked up over. There's a lot of terms used in marketing which are a specialisation of a more general term.
I'm sure everyone's aware that not all families contain young children. That doesn't mean the term "family friendly" for something aimed at young children which the parents could still enjoy is offensive.
Sure, they don't mean childless gay couples when they say, "family friendly", but then they usually don't mean families with older teenage children either.
Of course "someone employed by google" is also a meaningless label. They've got 90,000 direct employees and a bunch of open internal message boards.
 
Seems a little bat shit insane to have a meltdown over the word 'family' but someone has to think of the orphans and gingers I suppose.

<FutbolThink>
 
Dude this. We are like immune systems, if we have nothing to fight we get soft and find dumb stuff to fight over. Every man needs to do MMA in high school and have to have a single fight per year. We're so soft it's sad. Kids are such wusses these days

Obesity.
 
Attacking the source is a logical fallacy, especially when they are sharing the actual text from the Google servers.

Ummmm... no on the reason to not use Google. I gave you other valid reasons. Read the OP again.

Give poor tonni a break. He's just doing his shill duty.
 
Revealed: Google VP told employees to stop using the word FAMILY after staff complained the term was 'offensive, homophobic and excluded unmarried people without children, animals and those with multiple trans-feminine partners'

8677828-6605539-image-a-4_1547782053469.jpg

Employees at California HQ said the term was 'offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong' when used in a presentation about a children's product. VP Pavni Diwanji (pictured) told staff to be more conscientious about referring to family

Google was forced to backtrack on its use of the word 'family' after staff at its California headquarters kicked off because the term was used in the context of having children, it has been revealed.
The tech giant experienced a backlash from its own employees in March 2017 after a presentation about a product aimed at young people seemed to replace the term with the word 'family', leaving out various groups.
Far-right publication, the Daily Caller News claimed on Wednesday to have viewed internal communications from an insider in Mountain View where one employee stormed out of a meeting and called the company's poor choice of wording 'offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong'.
According to the website, approximately 100 people in Silicon Valley showed they agreed with the person's views by up-voting a statement they posted to the company's board.

'This is a diminishing and disrespectful way to speak. If you mean 'children', say 'children'; we have a perfectly good word for it. 'Family friendly' used as a synonym for 'kid friendly' means, to me, 'you and yours don't count as a family unless you have children',' the employee is said to have written. 'And while kids may often be less aware of it, there are kids without families too, you know'.
The member of staff explained further that while their intention was not to completely obliterate the word at the Google HQ, it should not be used when specifically referring to parents.
Google's employee added that it conjures up reminders of organizations that use the word 'family' to suggest anyone who isn't heterosexual may not be included.

'The use of 'family' as a synonym for 'with children' has a long-standing association with deeply homophobic organizations,' the person continued. 'This does not mean we should not use the word 'family' to refer to families, but it mean we must doggedly insist that family does not imply children.

'Even the sense, 'suitable for the whole family', which you might think is unobjectionable, is totally wrong too. It only works if we have advance shared conception of what 'the whole family' is, and that is almost always used to mean a household with two adults, of opposite sex, in a romantic/sexual relationship, with two or more of their own children.'

Pre-empting an explanation that the presentation was simply identifying everyone, the writer pointed out that a product for children was unlikely to cater to adults, for example.
They added that such uses should come to a halt.

'If you mean that as a synonym for 'suitable for all people' stop and notice the extraordinary unlikelihood of such a thought! So 'suitable for the whole family' doesn't mean 'all people', it means 'all people in families', which either means that all those other people aren't in families, or something even worse,' the rant continued. 'Use the word 'family' to mean a loving assemblage of people who may or may not live together and may or may not include people of any particular age. STOP using it to mean 'children'.'

TL,DR

  • Google had to rethink the word 'family' in March 2017 when staff complained, it has been revealed
  • Employees at California HQ said the term was 'offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong' when used in a presentation about a children's product
  • Approximately 100 people seemed to agree with an internal thread from someone who stormed out of the offending meeting two years ago
  • The person said the word 'family' is not equal to having children and Google should stop the use of it in that context
  • Various employees said they referred to animals, spouses, boyfriends, parents and multiple trans-feminine partners as their family
  • It was also said not all children have families so the words aren't interchangeable
  • VP Pavni Diwanji told staff to be more conscientious about referring to family



So, the PC police have fallen to an all time low. This is the most ridiculous thing I have heard in quite some time. These snowflakes are resentful pieces of shit.
 
Yes op, those snowflakes are truly resentful pieces of shit.
 
Revealed: Google VP told employees to stop using the word FAMILY after staff complained the term was 'offensive, homophobic and excluded unmarried people without children, animals and those with multiple trans-feminine partners'

8677828-6605539-image-a-4_1547782053469.jpg

Employees at California HQ said the term was 'offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong' when used in a presentation about a children's product. VP Pavni Diwanji (pictured) told staff to be more conscientious about referring to family

Google was forced to backtrack on its use of the word 'family' after staff at its California headquarters kicked off because the term was used in the context of having children, it has been revealed.
The tech giant experienced a backlash from its own employees in March 2017 after a presentation about a product aimed at young people seemed to replace the term with the word 'family', leaving out various groups.
Far-right publication, the Daily Caller News claimed on Wednesday to have viewed internal communications from an insider in Mountain View where one employee stormed out of a meeting and called the company's poor choice of wording 'offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong'.
According to the website, approximately 100 people in Silicon Valley showed they agreed with the person's views by up-voting a statement they posted to the company's board.

'This is a diminishing and disrespectful way to speak. If you mean 'children', say 'children'; we have a perfectly good word for it. 'Family friendly' used as a synonym for 'kid friendly' means, to me, 'you and yours don't count as a family unless you have children',' the employee is said to have written. 'And while kids may often be less aware of it, there are kids without families too, you know'.
The member of staff explained further that while their intention was not to completely obliterate the word at the Google HQ, it should not be used when specifically referring to parents.
Google's employee added that it conjures up reminders of organizations that use the word 'family' to suggest anyone who isn't heterosexual may not be included.

'The use of 'family' as a synonym for 'with children' has a long-standing association with deeply homophobic organizations,' the person continued. 'This does not mean we should not use the word 'family' to refer to families, but it mean we must doggedly insist that family does not imply children.

'Even the sense, 'suitable for the whole family', which you might think is unobjectionable, is totally wrong too. It only works if we have advance shared conception of what 'the whole family' is, and that is almost always used to mean a household with two adults, of opposite sex, in a romantic/sexual relationship, with two or more of their own children.'

Pre-empting an explanation that the presentation was simply identifying everyone, the writer pointed out that a product for children was unlikely to cater to adults, for example.
They added that such uses should come to a halt.

'If you mean that as a synonym for 'suitable for all people' stop and notice the extraordinary unlikelihood of such a thought! So 'suitable for the whole family' doesn't mean 'all people', it means 'all people in families', which either means that all those other people aren't in families, or something even worse,' the rant continued. 'Use the word 'family' to mean a loving assemblage of people who may or may not live together and may or may not include people of any particular age. STOP using it to mean 'children'.'

TL,DR

  • Google had to rethink the word 'family' in March 2017 when staff complained, it has been revealed
  • Employees at California HQ said the term was 'offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong' when used in a presentation about a children's product
  • Approximately 100 people seemed to agree with an internal thread from someone who stormed out of the offending meeting two years ago
  • The person said the word 'family' is not equal to having children and Google should stop the use of it in that context
  • Various employees said they referred to animals, spouses, boyfriends, parents and multiple trans-feminine partners as their family
  • It was also said not all children have families so the words aren't interchangeable
  • VP Pavni Diwanji told staff to be more conscientious about referring to family



So, the PC police have fallen to an all time low. This is the most ridiculous thing I have heard in quite some time. These snowflakes are resentful pieces of shit.
my dog that died last year was FAMILY. I say we all turn gay so we kill off the human race.
 
Back
Top