Over a million people visited San Francisco for the Super Bowl a couple years ago
Dont think Green Bay is equipped to handle something like that
I assume that is based on the NFL projections on how many people the game will bring in. The game attendance was only 71,088. Where did everybody else go? City services were projected to cost $5 million. They use some questionable book keeping to get the numbers. Here is how they arrive at some figures;
Super Bowl City Attendance:
960,000
– Opening weekend (1/30‐1/31): 200,000
–Final weekend (2/6‐2/7): 300,000
– Monday: 60,000
–Tuesday: 60,000
– Wednesday: 75,000
– Thursday: 90,000
–Friday: 175,000
I'd be willing to bet that 95% of the people in attendance were there more than one day if not almost every day.
http://s79f01z693v3ecoes3yyjsg1.wpe...ontent/uploads/2016/05/SB-50-May-9-2016-1.pdf
There is a difference between the number of people walking through the turnstiles and the number of people who attended. One person going all 9 days is counted as 9 people. A large number of the people going to the venues are those living in the vicinity and not those coming from out of town and staying in local hotels.
Even the passengers on the transit system on a daily basis can be divided by 2 because they make a trip to the venue and a trip back where they came from.
The report estimates that 300K people from out of town visited for the Super Bowl and doesn't list the criteria for out of town. Do people from Oakland count?
The airport only shows 61,000 more passengers deplaning than the previous year in the same nine day period. This would seem to be a much better indicator of the actual number of visitors.
Another good indicator would be a comparison of hotel occupancy. They show 60 to 90% occupancy of the 34,000 rooms. 90% occupancy at 2 people per room would be 61,200 people. Not anywhere near a million people but very close to the airport figures.