Why won't democrats denounce Anti-FA?

They shouldn't denounce Anti-fa. That way, it guarantees Trump's 2020 win.
 
<{danawhoah}>

!!!

Thank your for your honesty Matt! If only more people were as brave as you!

You want to get down to the brass tax for a moment before yelling at each other again. I don't like the fact that my party is courting SJWs and the like. I hate the stupidity of some of the Democrats in office. I hate the fact that we do play group politics. Outside of this forum when I talk with conservatives we end up agreeing on a lot. Most people do. It's the little difference that get blown up into big ones.
 
He's OK. Of course I vehemently disagree with him on a lot of shit but I don't think he has bad intentions, nor do I think he's a straight up fucking liar like a LOT of leftists here are.

And yeah, you once gave me the business in the Heavies over Conor, LOL. @Pwent is a Conor fan too. Truce if you see any of my Conor posts in the Heavies, yeah? :p

i rarely go into the heavies anymore

too much empty "like" posting, for example,people just posting a gif of ronda or conor losing in unrelated thread in hopes for likes

i prefer bootyblasting libcucks in the WR
 
The left rests on a victimhood culture, they need victims, even if they have to fabricate them. And where there are victims, there needs to be aggressors. This is where the out-of-the-blue obsession with fringe groups such as the KKK and neo-Nazis come from. However the membership of those actual hate groups is minuscule, the lefties have no choice but to fabricate aggressors - every random person who disagrees with them, every centrist, every respectable conservative - they slap with labels of Nazi, fascist, white supremacist. I can't imagine the media hysteria (or rather, joyous elation) if the right had groups which behaved the way Antifa does. It's amazing what the left gets away with by hiding under the false moral pretence of defending 'victim' groups, who aren't victims and aren't being helped by the left's actions. This is what people are referring to when they talk about Marxism - people taking on the fabricated moral grievances of groups of fabricated victims using the pretence of morality to take unacceptable actions (such as violence) against a fabricated oppressor group.
 
Because revolutions need cannon fodder. Antifa make useful idiots on the front lines of the cultural war. After all, progressive socialists and communists have put a lot of time, effort and money into indoctrinating whole generations of our youth through our educational institutions and pop culture. Might as well get some return on that investment.
 
Why won't republicans denounce party memebers who think evolution isn't real, the earth is 6000 years old and they know better than the worlds top scientists.

Because those people are a dying off fringe and they're not going around trying to beat people up for disagreeing with them.

They shouldn't denounce Anti-fa. That way, it guarantees Trump's 2020 win.

<{1-69}>
 
Because those people are a dying off fringe and they're not going around trying to beat people up for disagreeing with them.



<{1-69}>


Except the entire house freedom caucus is filled with those exact people and they make legislation and stop importsnt legislation from psssing because they're all mentally insane. And they have a massive voting block that votes the most in based off their beliefs

Nice try though
 
The left rests on a victimhood culture, they need victims, even if they have to fabricate them. And where there are victims, there needs to be aggressors. This is where the out-of-the-blue obsession with fringe groups such as the KKK and neo-Nazis come from. However the membership of those actual hate groups is minuscule, the lefties have no choice but to fabricate aggressors - every random person who disagrees with them, every centrist, every respectable conservative - they slap with labels of Nazi, fascist, white supremacist. I can't imagine the media hysteria (or rather, joyous elation) if the right had groups which behaved the way Antifa does. It's amazing what the left gets away with by hiding under the false moral pretence of defending 'victim' groups, who aren't victims and aren't being helped by the left's actions. This is what people are referring to when they talk about Marxism - people taking on the fabricated moral grievances of groups of fabricated victims using the pretence of morality to take unacceptable actions (such as violence) against a fabricated oppressor group.

I was thinking about including something similar to what you said in the OP. Basically for example, Richard Spencer even being allowed to speak causes massive shitstorms. If he's even SEEN in public, there's a problem. Now imagine if we had a group of white nationalists actually fucking doing stuff REMOTELY similar to Anti-FA. Trump and every politician on the planet would be forced to denounce them. There's a clear double standard here and it's fucking sickening.

Anti-FA are legitimately using actual fascist tactics and no one fucking gives a shit. I seriously don't understand it. This is why I say I think leftists secretly like this shit. Trump is basically their worst nightmare and no one cares what happens to his supporters.
 
Something I've been thinking about for a while that Mike Cernovich reminded everyone at the White House press briefing:



Why have no Democrats come out and condemned, by definition, a domestic terrorist group that roams the streets like this? From rioting over Milo, to sending terrorist threats to Ann Coulter, to disrupting rallies in places like Portland and New York. They get peoples speeches canceled, physically assault people and at times are legitimately trying to kill Trump supporters. While Black Lives Matter is also a domestic terrorist group, I can kind of (but not really) understand why liberals largely refuse to denounce them as they are rioting under the guise of "trying to make a change." Anti-FA are literally just walking around calling everyone and anyone Nazi's and assaulting them.

Even today, an "alt-right" figure was assaulted in New York and arrested for defending herself. Also today, Paris had riots with police officers having molotov cocktails thrown at them to protest against """"""""""""""""""""""far right""""""""""""""" Marine Le Pen. From the first moment Anti-FA made headlines, you could scour all of social media and any news network and could find almost NO liberals denouncing them.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/chaos-paris-annual-day-march-10334456



All the while, Trump and his supporters are forced to denounce the KKK, a group that is largely insignificant, tiny, and which no one gives a fuck about anymore. When it comes to the War Room, a few of the good liberals (and trust me, there aren't that many of you) did denounce them, but the usual suspects either didn't denounce them (one of them actually took part in the riots) but tried to equate the Trump supporters DEFENDING THEMSELVES with the domestic terrorists known as Anti-FA.

Is this what liberals have been watered down into? Are they basically like "moderate" Muslims who don't actually take part in terrorism, but a large group of which secretly like what they see?


Because there are radical Democrats that are secretly funding the Antifa movement.
 
Exactly.

It's like when the leftists were screaming for Trump to denounce Nazism or Hitler or something like that.

It's OK when they do it though
 
I denounce antifa.

I also denounce ice cream headaches, toothy blowjobs, gas station sushi, and overpriced things.

Have I done my duty now? Good.

Fuck you.
 
Last edited:
They don't denounce ANtifa because Antifa isn't part of the Dems.
 
Anti F made sense when they were beating up skinheads, provided balance. Now that they are shutting down speech they can go f themselves.
 
Back
Top