Why not use fraction of that sum and have 1000's of maintained and ready nukes instead. And use rest of the money for whatever US needs?
Just curious.
Nukes are only useful as a deterrent. Once you actually use them, you have already lost. By contrast, a large, well equipped and trained army can be used for any number of tasks.
That's fucking terrifying.
It's the navy really
It would actually be quite glorious to shift a few hundred billion out of the defense budget and towards health care, education and infrastructure among other things.
That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard.
We outspend every country but one in the world per capita or student on both of them.
Why in the world would you think we don't spend enough money on healthcare and education?
I think 2 tjings
1) Russia and US and everyone else with nukes lie about the nunber of missiles they have active and non actice in stockpile.
2) Probably only countries with a known amount or capabilties are North korea, pakistan, france and UK. The Chinese, Russiand etc lie for sure and decieve.
3) You probably have lot more nukes then you think in cruise missiles sitting on air craft carriers or other submarines. And in bases.
Pretty beast. You should be proud if your American. The Ohio class holds the most SLBM ever made of submarine. Its a huge sub.
They're actually already up for replacement, a dozen new Columbia-class SSBN's will replace them and serve from 2030-2085. The principal nuclear armament will consist of "only" 16 x D5 but given how hydro-acoustic sensing and processing technologies are always advancing, the stealth upgrades will be worth it. These things scare the piss out of China.