- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 12,952
- Reaction score
- 2,791
Evidence is subjective, there's no way around this.
Question: if evidence is subjective and believers of different faiths are all susceptible to being convinced by evidence supporting their own religions only, doesn't that bring you right back to the initial argument of the OP? In other words, you'd be forced to conclude that you have no better reason for accepting your own religion than any other and would therefore be rationally compelled to withhold commitment to any specific faith.
If you want to introduce "more" or "less" evidence in this case, it seems to me that you're going to need to employ some objective criterion for evidence.
Then of course the corollary would be the possibility that there is not enough evidence to warrant belief in any supernatural religious claims.