- Joined
- Apr 1, 2011
- Messages
- 805
- Reaction score
- 0
The article makes solid points with the exception of aiming for a more egalitarian outcome. A more egalitarian playing field is a very different goal and supportable. Egalitarian outcomes aren't.
We should shrink patent protections because it opens the market to more competition. We shouldn't use government to set up walled gardens in the economy.
I don't see how an egalitarian playing won't lead to an egalitarian outcome? I don't think this distinction exists.
I'm unfamiliar with a policy that crated a equal playing field that also didn't create an equal outcome or vice versa.