Why do some people support Conor earning 100 million?

The guest said:
There is ZERO doubt in my mind that his biggest fans are gay. And, he clearly swings both ways.

There’s no disputing that, imo. Show me any straight male where there is actual photographic evidence that proves he’s not straight ( Not an actor in a role ). There’s the picture where he’s posing with his hand on another guy’s dick. No straight man in the world does that. Let alone poses proudly for a pic of it. There isn’t enough booze, or drugs in the world to make someone go against their inner self...Sorry.

His crotch crickets are in love with him. They are exactly like teenage girls obsessed with actors, or guys in bands. It’s their fantasy to marry said obsession. So, of course they take pride in what their object of desire does, or attains. And, of course they defend them unto death.

It’s about as simple as it gets. It’s not new. The only thing that’s reasonably new is the sexuality of those involved. Because, it’s usually straight ppl with heterosexual desires. But, in the freedom of the times we live in. Plus the added aspect of the anonymous nature of the internet. These ppl feel free to display their true nature much more than they probably do in their everyday world.

As long as Conor is putting the money back into the legit economy. Then it’s not a bad thing to have that kind of money. Every dollar he spends legally, trickles down the economic ladder. It’s just the money he spends illicitly that does nothing good for the economy. He got that money because there are actual assholes that are dumber than a sack of hammers. Floyd vs Pacman, I understand. But, that shit show exhibition. If you paid to watch that you’re a fuckin rube...Period.

I live with a shrink. Trust me on this. This is not just the thoughts of a layman. Though, any layperson should be able to tell you that 2 + 2 = 4.

Glad I could help clear this up.
Click to expand...

Usually guys with gaydars are :eek::eek::eek:s
 
chuckleknuckle said:
Eastern block Socialist regimes spent their limited money on steroid programmes that they couldn't afford, because their dictatorial scumbag leaders had stolen all the money while leaving their people to starve and eat their own faeces.

A wonder why their people didn't overthrow them all...

... Oh wait they did.

Good troll attempt though.
Click to expand...

In Eastern Europe, people lived better in socialism than today under capitalism. Look at the horrible social trends after the capitalist collapse. We had strong nations, stability, strong army, everybody feared us and our power, the Americans were running scared, great athletes, lots of medals. It is only now under the great tsar and protector Vladimir Putin that Russia is getting some strength back.

Steroids? Everybody is on steroids. America started cheating and we had to even the playing field. Our athletes were regularly beating Americans when the playing field was even. Athleticism under socialism was valued greatly.
 
Vojislav said:
Success was never defined through money, only in the modern times. We don't remember the rich people from the middle ages, we remember the great kings and heroes. Or do you value Fugger family more than Eugen of Savoy? Your logic only exists for 100-200 years and hasn't produced a single notable civilization. It has nothing to do with human nature.
Click to expand...

Actually, success was defined by economic power pretty much since the creation of chieftain goods. Although not a traditional currency, the owners were held in highest esteem in the village.

A person's wealth transferred into their standing and reputation in many ancient cultures, Rome a particular example. Many statues were paid for and built by wealthy men, and their standing in the community /country too.

I was on a dig where they found a neolithic palisade structure which the richest men in the area could view from a man made, elevated mound of dirt. Being on that mound of dirt was a big thing back then.
 
Vojislav said:
McGregor comes from Ireland, one of the richest and the softest countries in the world. He is from a higher middle class background. He had a more comfortable upbringing than literally 99% of the world.
Click to expand...

Tricolour Ardoyne AFB.jpg
Working-Poor.jpg
download.jpeg
hqdefault.jpg
Poverty-in-Scotland1.jpg

Yea that explains why he was on welfare.
 
Vojislav said:
Why would you want Conor (or any other fighter for the matter) to earn that kind of money? How does it benefit society? How does it benefit the sport? How does it benefit you personally?

I constantly read people here saying "Conor fought Floyd to earn 100 million dollars" as if it is a good thing, to excuse Conor ducking contenders and not defending for more than a year.

Having that kind of money is nothing but greed, but the worst thing is that his fans don't even get anything from it, they just support it for some reason, even though it's totally immoral and wrong from social perspective, not to mention that it destroys the sport.

It's not just Conor, it's the same thing with Floyd fans and other fans who support this type of fighters and their persona. For some reason they care more about how much money they make rather than the integrity of the sport. Then they openly excuse the ducking and cherry picking because it's "good business".
Click to expand...



Everyone should be happy for other peoples success. Jealousy and envy are overrated emotions. Unfortunately with success, most people lose their hunger and drive.
 
Vojislav said:
In Eastern Europe, people lived better in socialism than today under capitalism. Look at the horrible social trends after the capitalist collapse. We had strong nations, stability, strong army, everybody feared us and our power, the Americans were running scared, great athletes, lots of medals. It is only now under the great tsar and protector Vladimir Putin that Russia is getting some strength back.
Click to expand...

North Korea also have a strong national identity, stability, and a feared army.

At the expense of every other facet of their society.

Pretty much like the Eastern block.

The good old days of old people and babies dying of starvation in the streets. What a great time to be Socialist.
 
chuckleknuckle said:
Actually, success was defined by economic power pretty much since the creation of chieftain goods. Although not a traditional currency, the owners were held in highest esteem in the village.

A person's wealth transferred into their standing and reputation in many ancient cultures, Rome a particular example. Many statues were paid for and built by wealthy men, and their standing in the community /country too.

I was on a dig where they found a neolithic palisade structure which the richest men in the area could view from a man made, elevated mound of dirt. Being on that mound of dirt was a big thing back then.
Click to expand...

I don't care about Rome, it was a degenerate society that was conquered by the stronger superior barbarian people who created more powerful societies that were based on honor and ruled by the warrior caste. A lot of great European heroes disdained money and lived ascetic lifestyles. The concept of economy is recent too.
 
jojoRed said:
You're either an idiot or a troll. <{hughesimpress}>

I want Conor or any other fighter to earn as much as they can whilst providing entertainment and taking the least amount of damage possible.

How does it benefit society? It provides high level sports entertainment similar to the Football, NBA and NFL. <LikeReally5>

How does it benefit the sport? Potential higher level athletes will be drawn to the sport from a younger age aspiring to be the next Conor, Ronda or Artem. Raising the pay level for all athletes below them aswell due to raising the profile of the UFC and earning them more in TV channel deals, sponsorships etc.



Who doesnt want to see their favourite athletes getting paid for putting the mental and physical health on the line to entertain the masses? Unless youre an idiot, providing dangerous entertainment or any kind of service means you should get rewarded. Professionals getting paid doesnt benefit me directly but it directly and indirectly benefits a lot of people.
Click to expand...

Stopped reading at “taking the least amount of damage”

You’re watching people beat each other’s faces in for a living. Shut the fuck up with that taking the least damage bullshit. I want them to Just Bleed.
 
chuckleknuckle said:
North Korea also have a strong national identity, stability, and a feared army.

At the expense of every other facet of their society.

Pretty much like the Eastern block.

The good old days of old people and babies dying of starvation in the streets. What a great time to be Socialist.
Click to expand...

I love North Korea, so your argument doesn't work here.

Even if all the bad propaganda stories about North Korea were true, it would still be superior to the modern West. Think about it.
 
Vojislav said:
I don't care about Rome, it was a degenerate society that was conquered by the stronger superior barbarian people who created more powerful societies that were based on honor and ruled by the warrior caste. A lot of great European heroes disdained money and lived ascetic lifestyles. The concept of economy is recent too.
Click to expand...

Actually, the Roman empire lost its way because of imperial overstretch, poor financial management, as well as a shit ton of armies constantly attacking them, but that doesn't change the fact that it was the hegemony for a phenomenally long time.

The current cycle of rise and decline is only 100 years.

Which socialist regime can match that?
 
Whole I don't get why some folks care about the $$$, and find it silly that bring it up as a point of argument...

...I'd never question a guy for striking while the iron is hot...

Make that big money while you can, if you say otherwise you're either: a trust fund baby or young and still ideologically retarded
 
Vojislav said:
I love North Korea, so your argument doesn't work here.

Even if all the bad propaganda stories about North Korea were true, it would still be superior to the modern West. Think about it.
Click to expand...

Semi obvious troll becomes more obvious.
 
Vojislav said:
You need to keep people hungry otherwise they don't want to fight.

This is true on social level and it's true in sports as well.

Modern Western society is too greedy, too soft, too weak, too spoiled, too degenerate.
Click to expand...
Holy shit! You really are a socialist/Marxist/communist!! I mean a real “dyed in the wool” commie! I’ve NEVER met one. Good luck in whatever wasteland of a country and government you live in. Prosper and be well. Personally, I’ll enjoy the fruits of my hard work and perseverance here in the United States.
 
Vojislav said:
I hate capitalism.
Click to expand...

I take it you live on bread and water and donate all of your excess wealth to charity? I take it that you adopt homeless people into your home and take care of them?

You don't love the poor, you just hate the rich.
 
Last edited:
Adjutant said:
Holy shit! You really are a socialist/Marxist/communist!! I mean a real “dyed in the wool” commie! I’ve NEVER met one. Good luck in whatever wasteland of a country and government you live in. Prosper and be well. Personally, I’ll enjoy the fruits of my hard work and perseverance here in the United States.
Click to expand...

No I'm not, I'm a nationalist. As a nationalist and as a Christian I hate capitalism and respect socialism as the better alternative for the most part of the 20th century.
 
Vojislav said:
Why would you want Conor (or any other fighter for the matter) to earn that kind of money? How does it benefit society? How does it benefit the sport? How does it benefit you personally?

I constantly read people here saying "Conor fought Floyd to earn 100 million dollars" as if it is a good thing, to excuse Conor ducking contenders and not defending for more than a year.

Having that kind of money is nothing but greed, but the worst thing is that his fans don't even get anything from it, they just support it for some reason, even though it's totally immoral and wrong from social perspective, not to mention that it destroys the sport.

It's not just Conor, it's the same thing with Floyd fans and other fans who support this type of fighters and their persona. For some reason they care more about how much money they make rather than the integrity of the sport. Then they openly excuse the ducking and cherry picking because it's "good business".
Click to expand...
Didn't read but my stance is, shit, if you can con your way into that, more power to ya.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,866
Messages
55,451,084
Members
174,783
Latest member
notnormal

Share this page

Back
Top