Why do some fans call close decisions that could have gone either way robberies?

T

Tysonfan22

Banned
Banned
Joined
Oct 29, 2017
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
A robbery in my opinion is when one fighter completely dominates his or her opponent and then the decision goes against them.

Why do some people now call close fight decisions robberies?

It seems like a bit of an over exaggeration
 
Hyperbole on the internet? Inconceivable!
 
Even if a fight is a 2 round to one fight, its still a robbery when the wrong fucking guy wins. Belal and Matthews got bs wins tonight. Just terrible judging going on.
 
The scenario you describe basically never happens.
 
Because the fighter I wanted to win didn't win.
 
Sapp said:
The scenario you describe basically never happens.
Click to expand...

No, it definitely does.

A few guys have already said Means was robbed tonight, and peoplewere screaming robbery at Dodson vs. Moraes too.

Thats just the last two weeks.
 
Jawth said:
No, it definitely does.

A few guys have already said Means was robbed tonight, and peoplewere screaming robbery at Dodson vs. Moraes too.

Thats just the last two weeks.
Click to expand...
Tysonfan22 said:
Well it does
Click to expand...
I'm talking about the definition of a robbery in the OP. A scenario where a fighter "completely dominates" then loses a decision.
 
Agreed wholeheartedly with the OP. Robberies should be saved to describe decisions like Pearson v Sanchez, that one was straight up theft. Ones like that do rarely happen, I'd say it's more common in boxing actually.
 
The heavies is a place of extremes

Just like on here in every victory the winner "dominates" or "destroys" his opponent.

Sherdog prolly have a limited vocabulary too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,005
Messages
55,460,447
Members
174,788
Latest member
Santos FC 1912

Share this page

Back
Top