God I love rewatching old Marciano fights! He was probably one of the lightest HW's also considerably under 200 pounds!Marciano had the shortest reach of any heavyweight champion
The Gypsy King is doing whatever mojo the Gypsy's do on you for that. You are OK with the Klitschko Brothers however. Tons of African blood in Ukrainians.because all the boxers mentioned were black and all listed ufc were non-blacks (arguably dc too)
blacks have longer arms
Boxers are A level athletes for the most part
I agree. I do think that we need to "rethink" the reach advantage angle when we discuss MMA.Because MMA is not boxing. The body type that's great for boxing might not be great for wrestling or BJJ. It's a different sport with different rules and different approaches.
Don't forget Tommy burnsbecause you're being selective of who you pick
i can also mention
evander holyfield
james toney
roy jones jr
george forman
joe frazier
muhammad ali
because you're being selective of who you pick
i can also mention
evander holyfield
james toney
roy jones jr
george forman
joe frazier
muhammad ali
Wait for the "what about leg kicks" crowd to rock upI always hated these types of arguments, but I am starting to share that opinion. It makes me wonder even more what a top notch boxer could do in the UFC with a couple years TDD defense.
HW champion boxers have far more reach than UFC HW champs"
I know zilch about BJJ/ submission grappling, but I have never heard in all my years of Wrestling anyone insinuating that longer limbs were not a good thing. Listening to Joe Rogan and crew commentating, they seem to think that long limbs can also be advantageous in submission grappling. Is there really any aspect of MMA that favors shorter arms to longer ones?Why are most athletes shorter than most basketball players? If the only way you can score is by putting a ball into a hoop 10 feet off the floor, success will tend to select for taller heights. If the only way you can score is by using your arms to punch, success will tend to select for longer arms. In MMA there are a lot of roads to winning.
Exactly. Klischko "brothers" for example, and TYSON Fury obviously blood related to Mike TYSON.because all the boxers mentioned were black and all listed ufc were non-blacks (arguably dc too)
blacks have longer arms
I know zilch about BJJ/ submission grappling, but I have never heard in all my years of Wrestling anyone insinuating that longer limbs were not a good thing. Listening to Joe Rogan and crew commentating, they seem to think that long limbs can also be advantageous in submission grappling. Is there really any aspect of MMA that favors shorter arms to longer ones?
I just threw names out there that came to my head. I forgot Mir, Carwin, Nog, El Suave, Barnett, Randleman, Rutten, Smith or Coleman.It's funny how you go all the way back to Hasim Rahman, but you exclude so many champions from your list. It's almost as if you knew it would hurt your case if you listed every champion from the selected period:
Ruslan Chagaev - 74"
Lucas Browne - 77"
Charles Martin - 80"
Bermane Stiverne - 76"
Alexander Povetkin - 75"
David Haye - 78"
Nikolai Valuev - 85"
Samuel Peter - 77"
Sultan Ibragimov - 76"
Shannon Briggs - 80"
Oleg Maskaev - 79"
Siarhei Liakhovich - 74"
Lamon Brewster - 77"
John Ruiz - 78"
Corrie Sanders - 77"
Roy Jones Jr. - 74"
Chris Byrd - 74"
I've named all the champions excluded from your list, back to when Rahman won his first title. The total reach for these fighters is 1311 : 17 = 77,12". That number seems pretty average for a heavyweight, and it's even inclusive Valuev who was a freak of nature. It's not my intention to come off as a d***, but your list is just blatant cherry-picking. I have to call you out on that, good sir!
To answer your question: Reach isn't as important in MMA, because you're allowed to do other things besides boxing in this sport. It's pretty obvious. You can overcome your opponents reach advantage with kicks, and when you grapple it's pretty much negated.