- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 4,652
- Reaction score
- 1,226
Yeah, the WWECW sucked. But why were the ECW Television and Tag-Team titles not brought back during the WWECW days? I've never found anything online concerning the reason for this not happening. I believe WWECW would have been more successful if they brought these titles back. Not having these titles diminished the value of the WWECW Championship and, ultimately, the WWECW brand.
Question: Name one mid-card feud from the WWECW. You may not be able to because titles bring interest into these feuds. The Television title could have generated interest in the ECW's midcard. Having Marcus Cor Von, Tommy Dreamer, or CM Punk going at it for this title would have been pretty cool. Hell, the original WWE Hardcore title would have been an acceptable replacement as well.
The Tag-Team titles are self-explanatory. Teams like the FBI, Burke/Terkay (inb4 who da fook is dat guy), and the Hardy's could have benefited from this. Unlike Rhyno, the WWE could have also signed the original ECW Tag champs, Roadkill and Doring for this.
Without secondary titles, why care about the feuds in the Midcard and Tag-Team divisions if they're ultimately for nothing? The diminished value in the WWECW's title certainly didn't help getting any extra attention to the brand.
TLDR: Secondary titles bring more value and attention to the midcard and, ultimately, the ECW brand and main title.