why can companies can choose what speech is allowed in their business, despite the 1st ammendment | Page 3

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Daddy af, Feb 9, 2018.

  1. Trotsky Black Belt

    Trotsky
    Joined:
    May 20, 2016
    Messages:
    6,125
    Likes Received:
    11,396
    Lots of unnecessary spitefulness directed at this kid just for cordially asking a question...
     
    #41
  2. Cubo de Sangre Steel Belt

    Cubo de Sangre
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    26,712
    Likes Received:
    21,063
    Location:
    Hell
    If the Platonic ideal is to say whatever, whenever, and free of repercussion then nobody has it. But having more of it here than anywhere else is far from illusion. No Amendment is more highly regarded than the First.
     
    #42
  3. TheGreatA Black Belt

    TheGreatA
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    6,878
    Likes Received:
    8,600
    Location:
    Finland
    It might be highly regarded, but I don't think there is a whole lot of philosophical thought on the part of the average American, on what sort of conditions might enable free speech, and which might discourage it.

    The consumerism and corporate-driven culture of America certainly serves to discourage free speech and prevent the formation of new, fresher ideas. A person whose livelihood is at stake every time he opens his mouth about a controversial subject, due to potentially being fired and left with nothing, is not a man free to speak his own mind. Even if he will continue to rationalize his own condition as freedom, as all of us do.
     
    #43
    Fronk likes this.
  4. HomerThompson Yellow Card

    HomerThompson
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    32,621
    Likes Received:
    38,626
    Location:
    Terror Lake
    *your
     
    #44
    Daddy af and Edison Carasio like this.
  5. Cubo de Sangre Steel Belt

    Cubo de Sangre
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    26,712
    Likes Received:
    21,063
    Location:
    Hell
    Doubt the average person anywhere puts much philosophical thought into much of anything.

    Most of us are not existing in the world of corporate oversight and punishment that you seem to believe.
     
    #45
  6. Edison Carasio Excellence of execution belt

    Edison Carasio
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    18,174
    Likes Received:
    29,687
    [​IMG]
     
    #46
    Shoemaker and HomerThompson like this.
  7. HIMBOB Steel Belt

    HIMBOB
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Messages:
    29,982
    Likes Received:
    5,599
    Seems to sum it up nicely
     
    #47
    Cubo de Sangre likes this.
  8. VivaRevolution Yellow Card

    VivaRevolution
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2016
    Messages:
    14,686
    Likes Received:
    12,233
    The better question, is if we can tell a corporation they have to serve all customers, then why can't we tell them they have to allow free speech?
     
    #48
  9. TheGreatA Black Belt

    TheGreatA
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    6,878
    Likes Received:
    8,600
    Location:
    Finland
    Not today, perhaps, but in the future? The future might look very bleak indeed, in that regard.
     
    #49
  10. Higus Silver Belt

    Higus
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    11,522
    Likes Received:
    5,326
    Location:
    Somerville, MA
    Not a fair argument. There are plenty of scenarios where a corporation would not have to serve “all” customers.
     
    #50
  11. panamaican Senior Moderator

    panamaican
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    29,606
    Likes Received:
    17,461
    But that's more about the consequences of free speech as opposed to the availability of it.

    I don't know if you're married but people are often circumspect about their speech even with their spouse out of concern for the consequences. Does that mean that there isn't free speech in their relationships? I agree with @Cubo de Sangre, nowhere has speech that is free from consequence. But that's not free speech either.

    Free speech must certainly include the freedom to respond to speech. If someone is looking for a world where they can speak and not receive negative consequences then they want authoritarian speech in their favor, not free speech for everyone.
     
    #51
  12. Cubo de Sangre Steel Belt

    Cubo de Sangre
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    26,712
    Likes Received:
    21,063
    Location:
    Hell

    I share that concern. However I have some faith that if it starts to get out of hand there will be push-back. Right now it's just shit you see on the news. When people suffer it themselves, or see their friends and coworkers suffer, it will no longer be something that just happens to some dumb shit that deserved it.
     
    #52
  13. Amerikuracana Yellow Card

    Amerikuracana
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    37,564
    Likes Received:
    7,543
    Location:
    Macomb mi
    Yeah.. Only if you can show they are behaving like a "state actor" can you get them. Kind of sucks.
     
    #53
  14. DynamicLoosener The Greatest Showman

    DynamicLoosener
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Messages:
    9,857
    Likes Received:
    10,722
    Location:
    Red Dead Redemption 2
    TS thinks everyone working at walmart should be able to throw the N word around all the time in front of customers.
     
    #54
    tonni likes this.
  15. helltoupee Black Belt

    helltoupee
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2015
    Messages:
    5,222
    Likes Received:
    5,195
    Location:
    on one wheel
    Right. So if your daughter or mother was the only female in her workplace, and 20 males called her a slut on the daily, along with graphic descriptions of what they would like to do to her private parts, you'd just tell her to grow some thicker skin... ... ...
     
    #55
    tonni likes this.
  16. helltoupee Black Belt

    helltoupee
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2015
    Messages:
    5,222
    Likes Received:
    5,195
    Location:
    on one wheel
    Tell me more about how much you hate capitalism.
     
    #56
  17. Cubo de Sangre Steel Belt

    Cubo de Sangre
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    26,712
    Likes Received:
    21,063
    Location:
    Hell
    Does that qualify as "speech conducted outside of work"?
     
    #57
  18. TheGreatA Black Belt

    TheGreatA
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    6,878
    Likes Received:
    8,600
    Location:
    Finland
    Second only to Marxism which it ultimately enables.
     
    #58
  19. TheGreatA Black Belt

    TheGreatA
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    6,878
    Likes Received:
    8,600
    Location:
    Finland
    So what's the problem with free speech having the consequence of a lynch mob stringing some guy up in a tree, for being a godless, blasphemous heathen? That's a consequence, right? He was free to speak, and he was free to be dealt with accordingly. His words may well have caused wide-spread rebellion and outrage among a 18th or 19th century uneducated, religiously zealous population. His fault for being born in an environment consisting of stupid motherfuckers who get outraged to the point of violence, by assumptions that god doesn't exist.

    Countries like DDR abused that sentiment to no end. Hell, even Putin pretends that they have "free speech" while clinging onto that same type of sentiment (that there are simply "consequences" for speaking out). The government doesn't actually kill or physically assault people for speaking, just the psycho Commie, Neo-Nazi or Russian Mafia groups that it is in control of. Good luck trying to prove that he is actually controlling these groups, oh wait, you just disappeared. Well, that's what you get for trying to "rock the boat". Some people got outraged, and unfortunately you got fucked. Wasn't the government's fault, right?

    Nope, that's not it. Free speech can only be enabled if speech does not carry a consequence that threatens a man's livelihood. Otherwise we are still living in an environment where certain thought patterns are discouraged through social pressure.

    That's fine, I'm not uncomfortable with the idea that some dude arguing that pedophilia is great, gets shut down and never sees a public office again. Though unlike most, I'd be willing to live with that as long as I were able to speak my mind freely without worrying about these "consequences".

    As I've already established, that sort of a free environment can only be achieved culturally, not through government policy. Not by making up authoritarian laws that "impose freedom" on people that do not want it. Part of that is by making people understand that getting fired from your job, for example, is a disproportionately heavy consequence for speaking your mind. A consequence that cannot be excused on a philosophical or moral level. The only consequence that speech may carry, is more speech on the part of others. Which is, countering arguments, or a scolding, or whatever, to "sort a person out". Those are the sort of verbal "consequences" that we may apply to a verbal "offender".
     
    #59
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2018

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "fd5733925866a04e50edd70f38dfaa35"
monitoring_string = "603ac9fff68f23709f2a42bf5e29272b"