So many people complain that Conor hasn't defended yet. Although I agree he should defend now against Tony, I find any complaint about him not having defended already to be quite nonsensical. His goals have always been to win 2 belts and get super rich. Those were his goals. And before the Floyd fight, he had no reason to defend because he was pursuing his goals. So for the people who complain about this, I'd like you to answer what your decisions would've been when you had the same opportunities. Conor had an opportunity to go for the second belt, so are you saying you would put your "two belts" goal on hold so that you can defend a title? Conor had an opportunity to fight floyd, so are you saying you would put your 100m dollars to the side and instead defend a title? You all complain, but I guarantee you you would all make the same decisions. Otherwise you'd be insane for turning down those opportunities. So, who here is insane enough to say they'd have defended instead of going after the bigger goals?