- Joined
- Mar 1, 2012
- Messages
- 20,193
- Reaction score
- 7
So either you think wilder is the best p4p puncher of all time or you've tried to make the worst joke of all time.duh:
Fancy a bum?
So either you think wilder is the best p4p puncher of all time or you've tried to make the worst joke of all time.duh:
So either you think wilder is the best p4p puncher of all time or you've tried to make the worst joke of all time.
Fancy a bum?
hamed definitely deserves a mention definitely.I don't know what planet you live on, but please hijack actual discussion threads for no reason. You clearly know more than us wise one.
Moz, hamed put people to sleep out of nowhere but he doesn't get mentioned in lists like this because he got dropped a lot.
could be, he was a good heavyweight, maybe top five in that particular era which is saying a lot.He used to hit so hard his game plan in every fight was to get up close so he was safe from their punches but they wernt safe from his because he is one of the few people that could knock you out easily with punches that didnt reach full extension. But that obviously took the edge off his punches which is probably why his highlights are not as impressive as foremans, but the fact that was his tactic in every fight and the things ALL this fighters said tells me he probably did hit harder than foreman
I'd agree with OP & Moz's list.
Just for the sake of discussion-
I think you could make a case for Tyson being on there if you used a weighted average from every punch thrown.
He didn't deal out many 'throw away' punches, set up punches or jabs and almost every punch he threw had bad intentions.