white women told to check their privilege at million woman anti-trump march

Allow me to amend my statement: "People need to ignore the loony left because they are complete idiots".

There are plenty of non-loony leftists who can be rational so with them you're right...they should be engaged and at the very least treated politely. But the race baitors, gender deniers, privilege checkers, pocket counters, and all other perpetually outraged loons need to be confronted, resisted, and exposed...philosophically of course.

This is a masterclass in weaseling. From the content of your posts, you dismiss anyone you disagree with as a leftist who is not worth listening to because of their leftist views. Meanwhile, you don't take the time to understand the theory, or intentionally misrepresent it as some straw man, and call them loony in any event. For instance, a "gender denier"? Come on, man. This is some grade A bullshit.
 
It was only a matter of time before the left targeted white women the way they do white males. There's nothing black women hate more than a pretty white girl.

Or a pretty girl of any other race.


Eventually the left will start going after Asians and then only black people will be immune from 'privilege'.

I also, think this is a good thing the more people the far left attack the better. Eventually these liberal white women will either kill themselves of shame, get a race change, move out of the country or change their views.
 
Apples and oranges
Ehh, you're choosing to denigrate and marginalize people who you have deemed inferior to you according to your personal criteria. If anything, genetics is more a quantifiable metric than your perception of what constitutes "the left".

You used to be a more open-minded and engaging poster, what happened? I've enjoyed our exchanges in the past but you've pretty much gone Trump-troll for some time and I can't relate.
 
This is a great video on the top 5 issues affecting American blacks today. The #1 issue? Unquestioning allegiance to so-called progressive policies.

 
thats not true. the clothes you are wearing are made somewhere else. the oil in your car might as well be dead organic matter from the humans who died for its export.

its an incredibly naive perspective, and one i dont share. we are all citizens of the world whether we want to be or not.

Most of the world is poor, you can't save them without bringing us down along with them. Neocons love to push globalist policies that lower the standards of living in western countries by appealing to idealists and useful idiots like you.
 
Lol at white women feeling excluded. How will they get by? Do white women upset by this understand how petty and lame they sound? As if that compares in any way to what African American women have had to endure
Obama.PageTwo-386x500.jpg
 
It sounds like you don't socialize with many women except maybe seeking out outrage porn on Twitter. Are you implying women shouldn't have freedom? Wasn't your wife supporting you sorry ass for a long time.

Bro, my friends call me pussy-slayer. Do you even lift, bro? ;)

I am not saying that women should not have freedom. I am saying the the influence of a stable man in a woman's life is something that is greatly underestimated. When a woman has a stable man in her life she is less neurotic and more balanced. The independent, "I don't need no man," career woman often becomes neurotic in her mid-30s and starts collecting cats or adopts an African child who she makes neurotic because of an unhealthy emotional attachment due to the lack of a stable relationship.

There is a lot to be said of the positive social and emotional influences of a family consisting of a stable man, a caring woman who looks up to him and children to look after. The disintegration of the family is something the feminists have been fighting for with great enthusiasm. Feminists greatly encourage the destruction of males and family.

Women can do whatever they choose to do if they have the competence and ability to pursue their goals. I think it is rather patronizing and insulting towards women to make special exceptions for them so, like a younger sibling, they can play too.

I think society has gotten far too caught up with the 'Girl Power" fad and we have turned a blind eye to the importance of developing strong male role models in society. Manliness is on the decline and civilization along with it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thats not true. the clothes you are wearing are made somewhere else. the oil in your car might as well be dead organic matter from the humans who died for its export.

its an incredibly naive perspective, and one i dont share. we are all citizens of the world whether we want to be or not.

Speak for your self, I am a citizen of the US not the world.. I am not a globalist.
 
Bro, my friends call me pussy-slayer. Do you even lift, bro? ;)

I am not saying that women should not have freedom. I am saying the the influence of a stable man in a woman's life is something that is greatly underestimated. When a woman has a stable man in her life she is less neurotic and more balanced. The independent, "I don't need no man," career woman often becomes neurotic in her mid-30s and starts collecting cats or adopts an African child who she makes neurotic because of an unhealthy emotional attachment.

There is a lot to be said of the positive social and emotional influences of a family consisting of a stable man, a caring woman who looks up to him and children to look after. The disintegration of the family is something the feminists have been fighting for with great enthusiasm.

Women can do whatever they choose to do if they have the competence and ability to pursue their goals. I think it is rather patronizing and insulting to women to make special exceptions for them so, like a younger sibling, they can play too.

I think society has gotten far too caught up with the 'Girl Power" fad and we have turned a blind eye to the importance of developing strong male role models in society. Manliness is on the decline and civilization along with it.
I think the balance argument goes both ways. Without a proper woman, afforded her proper place with dignity, men can turn into this

 
Its a lot easier to have a broad movement with a broad goal than it is to have 34 different colors of feminism.

Sinatra would have said women's liberation was a "broad movement" by definition.

frank-sinatra-quotes-about-women-584.jpg
 
I think the balance argument goes both ways. Without a proper woman, afforded her proper place with dignity, men can turn into this



I truly believe that men and women need each other for harmony and balance. I also believe strongly in the saying, "Behind every great man is a great woman."


Bill Clinton may have also been on to something when he said:

quote-behind-every-great-man-there-stands-a-great-woman-behind-every-great-woman-is-a-great-william-j-clinton-145-80-95.jpg
 
I truly believe that men and women need each other for harmony and balance. I also believe strongly in the saying, "Behind every great man is a great woman."

I sort of believe that but in the liberal way I guess. I think everyone needs a good partner if they really want to make it through life no matter what they are. Marriage is a very good thing.
 
I sort of believe that but in the liberal way I guess. I think everyone needs a good partner if they really want to make it through life no matter what they are. Marriage is a very good thing.

Partnership is the key word.
 
I sort of believe that but in the liberal way I guess. I think everyone needs a good partner if they really want to make it through life no matter what they are. Marriage is a very good thing.
I think the point that @Devout Pessimist is trying to make is that there are differences between the sexes that matter in the context of marriage. I think he has a point. Look at the gay community, lesbians are not like gay men and neither are like straight couples generally speaking. Gay men represent hyper-masculinity(hyper-sexual and superficial) while lesbians represent hyper-femininity(stability seeking).

Admittedly that's a bit of my psychoanalysis babble so take it with a grain of salt.
Partnership is the key word.
True but not all partners are equal. Someone like DP might argue that the ideal power split(for lack of a better term) is not 50/50 but something in favor of the man, even if its only slightly like 52/48.
 
I truly believe that men and women need each other for harmony and blowjobs. I also believe strongly in the saying, "Behind every great man is a great woman."


Bill Clinton may have also been on to something when he said:

quote-behind-every-great-man-there-stands-a-great-woman-behind-every-great-woman-is-a-great-william-j-clinton-145-80-95.jpg
Fixed that for you.
 
I think the point that @Devout Pessimist is trying to make is that there are differences between the sexes that matter in the context of marriage. I think he has a point. Look at the gay community, lesbians are not like gay men and neither are like straight couples generally speaking. Gay men represent hyper-masculinity(hyper-sexual and superficial) while lesbians represent hyper-femininity(stability seeking).

Admittedly that's a bit of my psychoanalysis babble so take it with a grain of salt.

Ya think? Its always seemed to me like when people partner out that one side tends to be more domestic and one tends to work more and make more and I have seen this play out in almost every gender combo you can make. I dont know that from stats or anything though just observations in folks I know
 
I think the point that @Devout Pessimist is trying to make is that there are differences between the sexes that matter in the context of marriage. I think he has a point. Look at the gay community, lesbians are not like gay men and neither are like straight couples generally speaking. Gay men represent hyper-masculinity(hyper-sexual and superficial) while lesbians represent hyper-femininity(stability seeking).

Admittedly that's a bit of my psychoanalysis babble so take it with a grain of salt.

True but not all partners are equal. Someone like DP might argue that the ideal power split(for lack of a better term) is not 50/50 but something in favor of the man, even if its only slightly like 52/48.

I think partnership has more to do with consent rather than equity in terms of how the power-split is set up in a relationship between two people.

This is should dependent on the mutually acknowledged context of the relationship, rather than the fixed mothballed gender-absolutism of ol' dead-ass Schopenhauer.
 
Back
Top