White woman calls cops on black man babysitting white kids

[MicroBrew]

I'm too lazy to look up what an incel is

The scientific term is : Incelopithicus Afarensis

 

[MicroBrew]

This is why you apparently need your own kids kidnapped because you are so thick you require a thing to happen to you to actually understand fucking REALITY.

I already posted the actual REAL LIFE statistics on kidnappings and you are still too blind as fuck to get passed the professional victimization BULLSHIT here...not even with a second link from actual professionals talking about how to PREVENT KIDNAPPINGS even talking about situations like this one...

Not even a little amount of reality is being allowed into your thick skull, so perhaps if you suffer through it like so many 1000s of others have, it will.

The stats you posted , specifically the underlined one, said 27% of kidnapping is by an acquaintance. That doesn't mean 27% of acquaintances who babysit children are going to be kidnappers. So your Stats doesn't justify being suspicious of non-related males babysitting children.

Why not have society stop and question every child seen with a male adult, why limit the concern to acquaintances, since your stats do state 49% of kidnapping is by a relative, which could be a parent or not. But if you are going to justify the woman's actions by the Stats, then why is it wrong to call the police on all males accompanying children?

 

[panamaican]

lol. you have no good argument.



The whole point of having a baby is so that you can have a family and form bonds with that baby.

If you are just going to drop it off at a daycare center and f**k off to work for 12 hours at some office, then what's the point?

The baby doesnt have a mother. There is evidence that young children experience trauma of abandonment when left alone or dropped off at daycare.

Lots of good reasons to pay someone else to do the things that you don't do well.

If it's your wife's birthday, but you are busy working, it would be like paying someone else to date your wife and saying "it's the same thing"... "I have to work because it makes better economic sense, sorry honey"

How would she feel about that?

Ask your wife how she likes your bull. You're more likely to get a useful answer from her than from me.

But sidestepping that humorous point for a moment - your entire premise is faulty. Are you saying that the husband should just stop working and stay home with the kids? The mom too? If they're both at home bonding with the child - who's at work?

Pause...is this where you start arguing that the father should still go to work while the mother stays at home?

Yet child development specialists emphasize that kids needs bonding with both parents for healthy development. It makes no sense to deny them both parents and to only get half the bonding they need. So, that means both parents should quit work.

So, if we're going to talk about bonding and family then how are you accounting for that issue in your anti-daycare position?

 

[Goonerview]

Ask your wife how she likes your bull. You're more likely to get a useful answer from her than from me.

But sidestepping that humorous point for a moment - your entire premise is faulty. Are you saying that the husband should just stop working and stay home with the kids? The mom too? If they're both at home bonding with the child - who's at work?

Pause...is this where you start arguing that the father should still go to work while the mother stays at home?

Yet child development specialists emphasize that kids needs bonding with both parents for healthy development. It makes no sense to deny them both parents and to only get half the bonding they need. So, that means both parents should quit work.

So, if we're going to talk about bonding and family then how are you accounting for that issue in your anti-daycare position?

Men can't breastfeed. Men earn more money than women among other reasons is why mothers should stay at home.

From the ages of 0-3 I would say it is very important for mothers to be at home with the baby, absolutely.

Fathers and mothers have different roles as parents. The fact that this needs to be said shows how much we have regressed as a society.

 

[MicroBrew]

Ask your wife how she likes your bull. You're more likely to get a useful answer from her than from me.

But sidestepping that humorous point for a moment - your entire premise is faulty. Are you saying that the husband should just stop working and stay home with the kids? The mom too? If they're both at home bonding with the child - who's at work?

Pause...is this where you start arguing that the father should still go to work while the mother stays at home?

Yet child development specialists emphasize that kids needs bonding with both parents for healthy development. It makes no sense to deny them both parents and to only get half the bonding they need. So, that means both parents should quit work.

So, if we're going to talk about bonding and family then how are you accounting for that issue in your anti-daycare position?

Ofcourse he doesn't mean for the dad to stay at home. He strikes me as a traditionalist / conservative, so he would want the man to be the head of the house and the breadwinner , and the wife to cook, clean and look after the kids and husband. Like it was decades ago, when women were told of their place in life.

 

[Ice That Jaw]

Yeah, from pre-school.

Note I'm talking mainly about babies from 0-3 years old.

My point still stands.

You're talking about mental issues that stem from actions when you were a toddler? Lol

How vivid is your memory from age 0-3? Were you touched in the no-no area back then?

 

[panamaican]

Men can't breastfeed. Men earn more money than women among other reasons.

From the ages of 0-3 I would say it is very important for mothers to be at home with the baby, absolutely.

Fathers and mothers have different roles as parents. The fact that this needs to be said shows how much we have regressed as a society.

Don't backtrack your argument. You said forming a family and bonding with the child.

Child development specialists state that bonding with the father is important for early child development. Are you now claiming that bonding with fathers isn't important? Or are you backing off the importance of early childhood development research?

I'm looking for some consistency here. Because either it's "No daycare because of the children and their developmental needs" or it's "who cares about children and their fathers, women should stay at home."

 

[Goonerview]

You're talking about mental issues that stem from actions when you were a toddler? Lol

How vivid is your memory from age 0-3? Were you touched in the no-no area back then?

Babies/young children don't have emotions or suffer from emotional trauma in your opinion.

i would disagree.

 

[Goonerview]

Don't backtrack your argument. You said forming a family and bonding with the child.

Child development specialists state that bonding with the father is important for early child development. Are you now claiming that bonding with fathers isn't important? Or are you backing off the importance of early childhood development research?

I'm looking for some consistency here. Because either it's "No daycare because of the children and their developmental needs" or it's "who cares about children and their fathers, women should stay at home."

I'm not backtracking shit.

It's important but not as important as with a mother. Parents have different roles, especially in the first few years of a babies life. This is clear.

 

[panamaican]

Ofcourse he doesn't mean for the dad to stay at home. He strikes me as a traditionalist / conservative, so he would want the man to be the head of the house and the breadwinner , and the wife to cook, clean and look after the kids and husband. Like it was decades ago, when women were told of their place in life.

Oh, that's obvious. It's why the "children need to bond and form a family" schtick is such bullshit. Because the moment I bring up fathers bonding with children, he reverts to the importance of making money.

Of course, his ilk will say that mothers should stay home and bond with children...until there's a divorce. At which point, he will ask, in sheer befuddlement, why men don't get custody more often.

 

[MicroBrew]

Oh, that's obvious. It's why the "children need to bond and form a family" schtick is such bullshit. Because the moment I bring up fathers bonding with children, he reverts to the importance of making money.

Of course, his ilk will say that mothers should stay home and bond with children...until there's a divorce. At which point, he will ask, in sheer befuddlement, why men don't get custody more often.

Social conservatives think it is perfectly fine to have the dad work cause that's how it was before the sexual revolution and the 60s, and those were glory days. They think the West has deteriorated due to women becoming more free and minorities being less submissive.

 

[panamaican]

I'm not backtracking shit.

It's important but not as important as with a mother. Parents have different roles, especially in the first few years of a babies life.

You're backtracking. You should stop, it makes you look weak and ineffectual and uninformed.

You stated, and I quote:

The whole point of having a baby is so that you can have a family and form bonds with that baby.

Parents do have different roles. And both parents have important bonding roles in the early years of child development. Yet here you are saying that the father's important researched role isn't important at all. Well, if he's not home bonding with his kid...who's going to do it for him? You've already said that daycare and nannies are out. And if they're suddenly acceptable for men, well I don't see how they're not acceptable for women.

So don't backtrack. Who's going to perform the dad's role in bonding with the child if he is at work?

Here's a small sample of what we're discussing:

Even from birth, children who have an involved father are more likely to be emotionally secure, be confident to explore their surroundings, and, as they grow older, have better social connections with peers. These children also are less likely to get in trouble at home, school, or in the neighborhood. Infants who receive high levels of affection from their fathers (e.g., babies whose fathers respond quickly to their cries and who play together) are more securely attached; that is, they can explore their environment comfortably when a parent is nearby and can readily accept comfort from their parent after a brief separation. A number of studies suggest they also are more sociable and popular with other children throughout early childhood.

Why do you hate fathers? Are you some newfangled feminist who thinks we don't need men?

 

[panamaican]

Social conservatives think it is perfectly fine to have the dad work cause that's how it was before the sexual revolution and the 60s, and those were glory days. They think the West has deteriorated due to women becoming more free and minorities being less submissive.

They're idiots. It was WW2 that fucked up their program, not the sexual revolution. And that's before you stun them with the shocking history of how the genders really interacted before the industrial revolution.

 

[Ice That Jaw]

Babies/young children don't have emotions or suffer from emotional trauma in your opinion.

i would disagree.

I never implied that. I implied that it doesn't carry on through life because you simply don't have vivid memories of toddlerhood. But hey why not. Everyone is a victim these days anyway. Why not pull the I was abandoned as a toddler card.

 

[ScottE]

You're backtracking. You should stop, it makes you look weak and ineffectual and uninformed.

You stated, and I quote:

Parents do have different roles. And both parents have important bonding roles in the early years of child development. Yet here you are saying that the father's important researched role isn't important at all. Well, if he's not home bonding with his kid...who's going to do it for him? You've already said that daycare and nannies are out. And if they're suddenly acceptable for men, well I don't see how they're not acceptable for women.

So don't backtrack. Who's going to perform the dad's role in bonding with the child if he is at work?

Here's a small sample of what we're discussing:

Why do you hate fathers? Are you some newfangled feminist who thinks we don't need men?

You're arguing with someone that thinks that having a babysitter watch your kids, ever, is abandoning then them be raised by strangers. That families with working parents are doing so to afford lavish vacations and not just be able to pay for that kids college and the house in this day and age. So of course he thinks men should take next to no roll in childcare, even if the mother was the more capable earner.

He doesn't even understand that you could have a stay at home mother in the most 1950s set up possible, and it's still entirely possible for mom and dad to get a babysitter from time to time so you know they can have time alone to cultivate a functional marriage.

 

[tonni]

I'm too lazy to look up what an incel is

There’s been threads about incels on the ‘dog for a while now.

 

[IamStryker]

I don't really see a lot of male babysitters in general. It's usually women which this lady probably thought was odd and then convinced herself she needed to check to see if the kids were ok. She made a very bad judgment call. Or for all I know she is massively racist. I have no idea.

 

[Hollywood Jack]

lol. you have no good argument.



The whole point of having a baby is so that you can have a family and form bonds with that baby.

If you are just going to drop it off at a daycare center and f**k off to work for 12 hours at some office, then what's the point?

The baby doesnt have a mother. There is evidence that young children experience trauma of abandonment when left alone or dropped off at daycare.

Lots of good reasons to pay someone else to do the things that you don't do well.

If it's your wife's birthday, but you are busy working, it would be like paying someone else to date your wife and saying "it's the same thing"... "I have to work because it makes better economic sense, sorry honey"

How would she feel about that?

I suppose this is more for the benefit of others here since nothing seems to be getting through that thick fucking skull of yours, but again you're talking pure nonsense. People typically work 8 hours a day in an office, from 9-to-5, hence why it's called a 9-to-5 and not a 9-to-9. But again, you always automatically go to some stupid extreme, i.e. "12 hours at some office".

Claiming that they don't have a mother is pure histrionic crap. The hours where the mother is at work is mostly overlapped by the child being at school. There are about 3 hours where the child is out of school and the mother is still at work or on her way home from work and then they spend the rest of their time together.

Yeah, obviously it's great when a man can make enough on his own so that his wife doesn't have to work, but that's not the reality for the average person anymore. The fact that you think the average father is a loser and the average mother is abandoning her kid because she has to work says a lot more about you than it does about them.

 

[IamStryker]

You're talking about mental issues that stem from actions when you were a toddler? Lol

How vivid is your memory from age 0-3? Were you touched in the no-no area back then?

I'm not chiming in on the actual topic when I say this but you might be interested to know how critical the early years actually are. I agree with you that we can't actually recall those memories ourselves very well. I don't actually remember those years either. But in college and in working at various organizations I learned how kids who were abused at very young ages are changed forever because of it. Here's one example https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases...achment-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352939

 

[Thai Otoshi]

I can't tell you the amount of bullshit calls like this I go on. Pisces us off to no extent.

FOUND IT!!!

@method115