White Supremacy hate-site dailystormer online again

No, you don't know that. Most likely he wouldn't though because globalists are anti-individual and Jesus was very much about the individual and personal responsibility.
fuck-off-u-leech-boot-straps.jpg
 
Jesus would have been a globalist and a liberal, you know it, I know it everyone knows it.

Deal with it.

He was always about self sacrifice for the good of the many, pretty much definition of the "evil globalists" cuckservatives screech about

jesus wouldnt have been a liberal in the modern sense where people mean socialist

socialists want to legislate morality and force sharing under threat of force

the bible is very clear that God and Jesus want to give people the choice of whether they want to be charitable and compassionate, or if they want to keep their shit to themselves. jesus never wouldve made his apostles go rob rich people and redistribute their wealth
 
How are globalist anti individual? What does that even mean?

You didn't watch the video I posted it seems; anyway, they push collectivism as part of identity politics. Identity politics, on both sides, doesn't care about who you are as an individual, only what group you're in. Thus I can look at a straight white man and say he's an oppressor and look at a black woman and correctly place here on the hierarchy of oppressed.

Thinking about why identity politics is so popular these days; well it's Neo-Marxism. When the Marxist sympathizing intellectuals could no longer in good conscience defend communism after the atrocities of the USSR and Mao's China had come to light, they transformed their argument of "life is a power struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeois and capitalism is theft and oppression" to Derrida's argument that all of Western civilization is built upon oppressive, patriarchal attitudes of "trying to impose order on reality" (wherein he mistakes chaos for reality, not seeing the very clear chaos/order dichotomy that the Daoists understood long before he was born). To say his influence was great would be an understatement, hence where we are today with this sort of faux capitalist system we call globalism for lack of a better word, one which seeks to undermine the basic tenets of Western civilization under the guise of freeing the oppressed collective from the selfish oppressors while simultaneously ensuring people give up their rights to the new form of government (i.e. the previously-referred to New World Order, if you will).
 
Meant to quote Homer but I deleted his junky meme by accident; maybe if the mods would let me edit my posts I wouldn't have to do this.
 
jesus wouldnt have been a liberal in the modern sense where people mean socialist

socialists want to legislate morality and force sharing under threat of force

the bible is very clear that God and Jesus want to give people the choice of whether they want to be charitable and compassionate, or if they want to keep their shit to themselves. jesus never wouldve made his apostles go rob rich people and redistribute their wealth

but he will light you on fucking fire for all eternity if you dont. How is that different than just forcing people the normal way?
 
We had a thread on here when hosting company GoDaddy kicked 'the daily stormer' out after a hateful article that mocked the Charlottesville victim. The CEO of CloudFlare also issued a statement, explaining that he cancelled their contract after he 'woke up and decided the page shouldn't be on the Internet' and kind of criticized his own power 'nobody should have that power' at the same time, which, of course, is an interesting discussion.

Well, maybe he doesn't. The site is back online, this time under an Austrian top-level domain and protected by BitMitigate.

Do you think it's immoral to host a site with highly questionable content such as white supremacy? Is it the right strategy to ban them?
I think it was pretty obvious that it was simply an attempt to avoid negative press when shit hit the fan.
They posted racist articles every single day and GoDaddy didn't have a problem with it but after the Charlottesville attack and all the mainstream media attention, they suddenly remembered that the site broke their rules.
II think it is good for WNist to be back online, even though I typically don't agree with them. Because alternative POVs should be heard .
 
The coli is still up and there is some very racist stuff being talked-about there.
 
Back
Top