- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,443
- Reaction score
- 0
No, you don't know that. Most likely he wouldn't though because globalists are anti-individual and Jesus was very much about the individual and personal responsibility.
No, you don't know that. Most likely he wouldn't though because globalists are anti-individual and Jesus was very much about the individual and personal responsibility.
Jesus would have been a globalist and a liberal, you know it, I know it everyone knows it.
Deal with it.
He was always about self sacrifice for the good of the many, pretty much definition of the "evil globalists" cuckservatives screech about
How are globalist anti individual? What does that even mean?
at least we still have SherFront
jesus wouldnt have been a liberal in the modern sense where people mean socialist
socialists want to legislate morality and force sharing under threat of force
the bible is very clear that God and Jesus want to give people the choice of whether they want to be charitable and compassionate, or if they want to keep their shit to themselves. jesus never wouldve made his apostles go rob rich people and redistribute their wealth
free speech.
radial islam has it, ripskater has it, nazis has it, my dog has it--but chooses to remain silent.
i think thats a correlation, not a codeword
there are a lot of globalists who arent jewish, justin trudeau for example
Jewstin Truejew.
II think it is good for WNist to be back online, even though I typically don't agree with them. Because alternative POVs should be heard .We had a thread on here when hosting company GoDaddy kicked 'the daily stormer' out after a hateful article that mocked the Charlottesville victim. The CEO of CloudFlare also issued a statement, explaining that he cancelled their contract after he 'woke up and decided the page shouldn't be on the Internet' and kind of criticized his own power 'nobody should have that power' at the same time, which, of course, is an interesting discussion.
Well, maybe he doesn't. The site is back online, this time under an Austrian top-level domain and protected by BitMitigate.
Do you think it's immoral to host a site with highly questionable content such as white supremacy? Is it the right strategy to ban them?
I think it was pretty obvious that it was simply an attempt to avoid negative press when shit hit the fan.
They posted racist articles every single day and GoDaddy didn't have a problem with it but after the Charlottesville attack and all the mainstream media attention, they suddenly remembered that the site broke their rules.
Metal Mohammed!<Lmaoo>
I'm an Irish Republican Dissident so too late.everyone in this thread just got on a watchlist
*expandCould you expound on this thought?
except but muslim?Freedom has no but.
whats a but muslim?except but muslim?
whats a but muslim?