White nationalist should make their 'ethno-state' in Europe not USA. Which country will they choose?

[manlyseaeagle]

I think you're being a disgusting progressive. Any video by someone that puts "but if it was real, it'd be good" is bullshit.

Birth rates are bellow replacement levels.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...g-despite-an-increasing-world-population.html

Mass immigration is going to speed up the replacement process. Major cities in many countries are seeing demographic change at a rapid pace. Sweden is a progressive nightmare and your insanity makes sense now. The idea that kids are too expensive is being promoted in many countries and the idea you should enjoy life instead of having kids is also being promoted. Yes white people are being shamed.

But why did the politicians of England, Sweden, Australia and Canada open the borders to mass immigration ?

 

[lfd0311]

Irish and Italians have the same colour skin? Next you'll say oil and water are the same because they're both liquids.

UIh... yes, some of them do...

 

[lfd0311]

A buddy of mine is a blonde haired, blue eyed Italian. I keep trying to convince him he's adopted.

Wow dude, you are the definition of an absolute thinker, huh?

 

[lfd0311]

But why did the politicians of England, Sweden, Australia and Canada open the borders to mass immigration ?

Because the EU forced them to? It's as if BREXIT never happened....

 

[lfd0311]

There's Black people living in Japan.

The entire foriegn population of Japan stands at a whopping 1%. Most black people in Japan are either American Military personnel or Africans directly imported to work in factories. The total number is very, very tiny. Your average person can't just go to Japan if you don't fit the appropriate racial qualifications.

 

[manlyseaeagle]

Because the EU forced them to? It's as if BREXIT never happened....

But what about Canada and Australia and even New Zealand ?

 

[Victor Maitland]

All of America will look like a combination of Mexico and Detroit in afew decades time . Thats what you're heading to unless the third world invasion of the west is controlled.

Ethnic posters are pumping their fists , but the country will just end up looking like the countries you escaped to have a better life. That "better life" wont be there anymore.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

All of America will look like a combination of Mexico and Detroit in afew decades time . Thats what you're heading to unless the third world invasion of the west is controlled.

Said the white man in Lincoln's day

 

[irish_thug]

Wow dude, you are the definition of an absolute thinker, huh?

I guess you don't joke around with your friends. You must be real fun at parties.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

The vast majority in the unite the right protest were men. Go figure.

I am guessing a lot of them are also mgtow (men going their own way) morons.

 

[Possum Jenkins]

What does it matter what Europe went through some generations ago, or if they were largely white? Do you believe that you can extrapolate the behavior of white people in the US today by looking at a different continent in a different era?

I don't agree with the OP, but what he's suggesting is that white Americans make their own State. A better analysis of what this State would look like would be examining the current culture and values that these people currently adhere to, including economic factors, etc., not looking at 1950s Europe.

Well, unfortunately, pre-1950s Europe is the closest thing we have to the hypothetical and much desired White American state. Because from the very beginning, the US has had major contact with people of other races.

Whether it was 20-25% of the total population being slaves in colonial times, to genociding Native Americans, to taking half of Mexico, to the arrival of millions of immigrants from Latin America and Asia, there has been constant contact with nonwhites. So the US isn't a good example.

Europe as a whole, on the other hand, was 95%+ white for centuries, probably millennia, so they're far more similar. Much like the hypothetical US state, they were also racially white, with lots of ethnic/cultural variety.

Obviously, tons of political organs are in place now that would likely be factors in (the much-maligned EU, for example) keeping peace, but this isn't meant to be an all-encompassing analysis, just one based on ethnic groups.

 

[dontsnitch]

Well, unfortunately, pre-1950s Europe is the closest thing we have to the hypothetical and much desired White American state. Because from the very beginning, the US has had major contact with people of other races.

Whether it was 20-25% of the total population being slaves in colonial times, to genociding Native Americans, to taking half of Mexico, to the arrival of millions of immigrants from Latin America and Asia, there has been constant contact with nonwhites. So the US isn't a good example.

Europe as a whole, on the other hand, was 95%+ white for centuries, probably millennia, so they're far more similar. Much like the hypothetical US state, they were also racially white, with lots of ethnic/cultural variety.

Obviously, tons of political organs are in place now that would likely be factors in (the much-maligned EU, for example) keeping peace, but this isn't meant to be an all-encompassing analysis, just one based on ethnic groups.

You're implying that you can know how people will act based on their skin color. If you want to know what white people in the US are like, look at white people in the US. You're explicitly saying that Europe was mostly white so from that we can know how white people will act in another place in another time, while ignoring the era, the culture, the economy, etc.

Are you comfortable making the same conclusions about other races?

 

[Twelve75]

Central America is not white
South American is not white
Africa not white
Asia not white

85% to 90-93% of world population not white. USA is quickly becoming more and more Hispanic/Latino and Asian. Canada is becoming more Indian by the day. Australia and NZ are too tiny of populations and Asians will takeover Australia eventually. Russia is too large and is technically a multicultural country with a +20-25% population that is technically not white (Caucasus people) and other Caucasians.

Maybe Iceland? Finland? lol it makes no sense for these idiots to try and make a multicultural country that was once a native american homeland into their 'ethno-state'. Go back to europe if you want a pure white land.

Who are you going to mooch off of when they leave for Europe? P Diddy & Kanye?

 

[lfd0311]

I guess you don't joke around with your friends. You must be real fun at parties.

You were obviously not joking and are now trying to cover for that. Cool story though.

 

[Possum Jenkins]

You're implying that you can know how people will act based on their skin color. If you want to know what white people in the US are like, look at white people in the US. You're explicitly saying that Europe was mostly white so from that we can know how white people will act in another place in another time, while ignoring the era, the culture, the economy, etc.

No one has a crystal ball. There's precedent suggesting it's not a good idea is all I'm saying.

And historical precedence is a good reason to make political decisions. This is why Germany and Japan are forbidden from having militaries. They have precedent for being brutally destructive and imperial.

Are you comfortable making the same conclusions about other races?

Sure.

Whatever other race wants to eliminate others unlike them so they can re-live their glorious, single-race glory should get reminders of their past as well. Curiously enough, there is only one group with that obsession.

 

[irish_thug]

You were obviously not joking and are now trying to cover for that. Cool story though.

You seriously think that? Enjoy believing everything you read at face value for the rest of your life.

 

[lfd0311]

You seriously think that? Enjoy believing everything you read at face value for the rest of your life.

The irony of this statement, after reading your comments in this thread.

 

[irish_thug]

The irony of this statement, after reading your comments in this thread.

My comments were joking in nature. If that was lost on you it reflects more on you than it does me.

 

[dontsnitch]

No one has a crystal ball. There's precedent suggesting it's not a good idea is all I'm saying.

And historical precedence is a good reason to make political decisions. This is why Germany and Japan are forbidden from having militaries. They have precedent for being brutally destructive and imperial.



Sure.

Whatever other race wants to eliminate others unlike them so they can re-live their glorious, single-race glory should get reminders of their past as well. Curiously enough, there is only one group with that obsession.

You're missing my point. You're using 1950's Europe to set your precedent. You're saying 1950's Europe closely resembled a white ethno-state so we can extrapolate those results to know what a white ethno-state would look like if we made one in America using white Americans. They're different people in a different era in a different continent with different politics and different problems.

Can we use 1950's Africa and extrapolate those results to know what a black ethno-state in the US would look like today?

Obviously it would be better to look at places in the US that are predominantly white to make a better educated guess on what the results would look like. Or if you want to look at Europe, you can look at places that are predominantly white today.

 

[RIPWarrior]

But why did the politicians of England, Sweden, Australia and Canada open the borders to mass immigration ?

To weaken the countries, create disunity and reduce resistance. They're making them more easily controlled.