- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,057
- Reaction score
- 2,362
There is a lot of things you have trouble understanding isn't there TS.At least this contains some good reasoning but then the ending is a train wreck lol
There is a lot of things you have trouble understanding isn't there TS.At least this contains some good reasoning but then the ending is a train wreck lol
Yeah bitch, he intended to.
You do realize that on the same invoice for the dick pills was also an order for clomiphene, right?
The only reason Jones is able to fight is because he snitched, not because he was exonerated.
I don't know if you've noticed, but Sherdog isn't a courtroom.
There is a lot of things you have trouble understanding isn't there TS.
Jones has passed tons of USADA tests.. They cleared him to fight last time after looking at all of his tests. Something went wrong with his post fight test.
What the fuck does " racial biaises " have to do with the objective fact Jones cheated and pissed hot ?
DC = 70 clean test under USADA
Jones = 0
Explain your observation of there being any racial bias with what I just said.
Yeah, he got caught. That’s why they test post fight. Because motherfuckers still be trying to cheat
Not that simple. He flunked a test he knew he had to take.. And they found a pinch of something. Basically if USADA kept missing something big. They are total Idiots..
They are total idiots and they did miss something big. Jones is fighting in December when he should be banned for 3 more years.
It's completely relevant, you're the one who tried to frame it in those terms. You're criticising his reply on the basis of it not being a courtroom argument. Ridiculous.I dno if you notice but that's irrelevant.
Haha haha Are you 7 years old or something?
what leniancy? His 30 month reduction is conditional on his snitching and if USADA isnt happy with his cooperation they will reinstate the 30 month suspension.
If he was innocent then he wouldn't be able to snitch
It's completely relevant, you're the one who tried to frame it in those terms. You're criticising his reply on the basis of it not being a courtroom argument. Ridiculous.