whats the latest on WAR MACHINE?

You're linking me to a quote from someone saying you shouldn't hit women. How does that make me a hypocrite?

You co-signed a post advocating special treatment. The post I quoted of you is about how feminism is problematic because it simultaneously advocates special treatment.
 
Last edited:
Reading isn't that difficult. You co-signed a post advocating special treatment. The post I quoted of you is about how feminism is problematic because it simultaneously advocates special treatment.

I can't tell if you're serious or not. You shouldn't beat the shit out of women. Do you think it's special treatment to not beat women? Do you think War Machine was right to beat a woman the way he did?
 
I can't tell if you're serious or not. You shouldn't beat the shit out of women. Do you think it's special treatment to not beat women? Do you think War Machine was right to beat a woman the way he did?

I'm perfectly serious. You shouldn't beat the sh*t out of anybody for cheating. Her gender is a non-factor. By saying 'you shouldn't hit women', you're insinuating that it would've been okay for him to just beat the man involved. If you believe that there are circumstances that warrant beating the sh*t out of a man but not a woman, then you advocate special treatment on the basis of gender. If you agree with the premise 'no one should hit anybody', then you wouldn't need to argue that no one should hit a female.
 
Last edited:
I'm perfectly seriously. Try and follow along: You shouldn't beat the sh*t out of anybody for cheating. Her gender is a non-factor. By saying 'you shouldn't hit women', you're insinuating that it would've been okay for him to just beat the man involved. If you believe that there are circumstances that warrant beating the sh*t out of a man but not a woman, then you advocate special treatment on the basis of gender. If you agree with the premise 'no one should hit anybody', then you wouldn't need to argue that no one should hit a female.

Ah, I get it. Yeah, you're absolutely right. I actually forgot about the guy. Everyone was talking about the woman in this scenario so that's what I was responding to. I sometimes have trouble getting my point across.
 
Ah, I get it. Yeah, you're absolutely right. I actually forgot about the guy. Everyone was talking about the woman in this scenario so that's what I was responding to. I sometimes have trouble getting my point across.

That's the issue with the 'don't hit women' mantra. We've been conditioned to think that violence against men is acceptable (either that or insignificant) and violence against women is unacceptable, regardless of the situation. These preconceived notions people have about men and women -- specifically their physical ability -- have very pernicious consequences in society (e.g. court judgements and the length of sentencing). It's better for everyone and much more logically consistent to say it's unacceptable across the board, but of course, as always, there are those that prefer the system that promotes inequality and special treatment -- white knights especially. It doesn't seem that you think this way, so I'll retract what I said.
 
Last edited:
That's the issue with the 'don't hit women' mantra. We've been conditioned to think that violence against men is acceptable (either that or insignificant) and violence against women is unacceptable, regardless of the situation. These preconceived notions people have about men and women -- specifically their physical ability -- have very pernicious consequences in society (e.g. court judgements and sentencing). It's better for everyone and much more logically consistent to say it's unacceptable across the board, but of course, as always, there are those that prefer the system that promotes inequality and special treatment -- white knights especially. It doesn't seem that you think this way, so I'll retract what I said.

Good talk, man. We had a discussion on the internet that didn't devolve into name calling and gif posting. Thumbs up.
 
I'm perfectly serious. You shouldn't beat the sh*t out of anybody for cheating. Her gender is a non-factor. By saying 'you shouldn't hit women', you're insinuating that it would've been okay for him to just beat the man involved. If you believe that there are circumstances that warrant beating the sh*t out of a man but not a woman, then you advocate special treatment on the basis of gender. If you agree with the premise 'no one should hit anybody', then you wouldn't need to argue that no one should hit a female.
but if she was in bed with another woman and he attacked 2 women, it would look a lot worse. admit it. society is what it is... quit trying to make stuff into what its not. its more immoral for a man to hit a woman than for a woman to hit a man, in america. you didnt make the rule, but u gotta play by it.
 
but if she was in bed with another woman and he attacked 2 women, it would look a lot worse. admit it. society is what it is... quit trying to make stuff into what its not. its more immoral for a man to hit a woman than for a woman to hit a man, in america. you didnt make the rule, but u gotta play by it.

'Immoral' is a meaningless term. Legally, there is no distinction, nor should there be. Two men or two women, it's equally wrong to beat up people for cheating on you.
 
Your gender doesn't entitle you to assault someone without reprisal. What's between your legs or what you identify as is a non-factor when determining whether one person has a right to hit another. You don't have special rights or special expectations by virtue of being a female.

Agreed, very well stated...

The flip side of that is if Christy Mac hit War Machine he had every right to beat her like that !?!?

On that we agree to disagree...
 
Agreed, very well stated...

The flip side of that is if Christy Mac hit War Machine he had every right to beat her like that !?!?

On that we agree to disagree...

The physical response should be proportional. No, just because a woman punches you doesn't mean you have carte blanche to pummel them. But the same goes for a man. It all depends on the scenario. If you're in a position of dominance and your attacker has already ceased his/her attack, then it's time to extricate yourself from the situation -- lest you end up becoming the attacker and landing yourself in jail.
 
He got Christy Mack to quit pr0n, serious business for the average sherdogger.


I'm sure she was much more damaged internally before this incident ever occurred.

Females like this bring trouble on themselves by their lackluster life choices.
 
That's called victim blaming, what you did there. That's not cool.


Its called a crime of passion. Definitely not right, but hard to say what anyone would do in the circumstances.
 
I'm sure she was much more damaged internally before this incident ever occurred.

Females like this bring trouble on themselves by their lackluster life choices.

"damaged internally" as in "taking huge d***s in every orifice as a job for years"?
Or mentally, like a "wake-up call"?

I've heard from friends who watch p0rn© that she still does private webcam sessions for guys who have way too much money to burn, but that after that incident, she is done with the industry and hardcore stuff in general.

Locked up, where jacking off becomes your n°1 hobby with weight-lifting and learning the fine art of making shanks and brew prison moonshine/pruno...
I don't think WM is going to make a lot of friends, Mack was probably a lot of crazy dudes waifu.
That huge MACK tattoo on his throat must make a nice target in locked up fans minds (and in a few sherdoggers hardcore white knights too of course); I've read that he got it covered somehow, would love to see a picture if true.

Poor WarMachine, he is living completely in Datsik's shadow, the latter being crazy more consistently, pulling more unexpected fun antics, having entertaining friends + a badass rival to talk shit about/shout death threats at.
And unlike Jones, you know these 2 are serious when they talk about killing each other.

Bur Warmachine's rival is a female pornstar, he is crazy in a unfunny ways, he did not KO Arlovski in his first MMA fight, he does not scream weird songs in the mic after he wins, etc etc....
Russia wins this one guys.

Krazy Horse/Kid Khaos has been pretty chill since 2015, I guess he was serious when talking about becoming positive role model for ghetto kids.
Or his friends stopped pranking him by constantly sparkling his weed with dust.
But he isn't a contender for the US anymore I'm afraid....

Joe Son rep Korea old school , but unless he kill other cellmates (what other outrageous things can he do locked up? Only Datsik has the power to break out by tearing the fence with his bare hands) he isn't helping creating fun threads on Sherdog.
I might have talked too fast, according to wikipedia:
"On September 13, 2013, Son was officially charged with Graham's murder. His trial is set to begin in March 2016"

Hey that was not long ago! I don't remember reading about him throwing feces at the judges so it was probably boring.... you got soft man...

/rant
 
Who gives a shit about that loser? He's also not in the UFC so no reason to be posting this in this forum.
Neither is Fedor yet people here are posting about him all the time.
 
surely he had court by now, but i dont remember ever hearing what his sentence was. does anyone have any links to info? he might be PC celled up with OJ, but i kinda doubt anyone would mess with him on the yard, with his credentials. credentials dont mean shit in prison, tho... all about that politics.
Still in jail, blaming his problems on others. Same old war machine.
 
Who cares, he's a degenerate but then again so is Christy Mac. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Back
Top