- Joined
- Oct 12, 2016
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 0
If speaking pure boxing vs pure kicking with nothing else, then boxing is more fundamental in thai/kickboxing, mostly because of the small arena size. You can only take a few steps before you hit the ropes, it's impossible to use the kind of movement you use in (proper) MMA arenas and once you get to the ropes, the boxer needs less space to work and is more mobile. That's the reason why Holzken can more or less simply walk down Raymond. He couldn't do that as easily if he was facing him in an MMA arena, which in that regard, is closer to "real" fighting.
Secondary reasons are that kicks require and take away balance (by going on one leg) to use while rooting you to your position, while punches don't necessarily do so, and that kicks have a specific range they work in while punches can transition fluidly between ranges. This means that the kicker has to execute his game more or less perfectly, or he's going to let the boxer get in on and stay on him and that'll probably be the end of it. Same reason why both a kicker and puncher face heavier consequences from the actions of a wrestler than vice versa.
Secondary reasons are that kicks require and take away balance (by going on one leg) to use while rooting you to your position, while punches don't necessarily do so, and that kicks have a specific range they work in while punches can transition fluidly between ranges. This means that the kicker has to execute his game more or less perfectly, or he's going to let the boxer get in on and stay on him and that'll probably be the end of it. Same reason why both a kicker and puncher face heavier consequences from the actions of a wrestler than vice versa.
Last edited: