Ah yes, just ignore everything else I listed. Nice tactic for debating there, just respond to the shit you feel like and pretend everything else isn't there.So stats are the new benchmark. ok.
Ah yes, just ignore everything else I listed. Nice tactic for debating there, just respond to the shit you feel like and pretend everything else isn't there.
that's one of the dumbest questions I've heard asked by a shertard so congrats for that.So stats are the new benchmark. ok.
Probably the most underrated fighter in the history of MMA. It's hilarious how little respect he gets and I am not even a fan.
that's one of the dumbest questions I've heard asked by a shertard so congrats for that.
Stats are by far the key benchmark for how good a fighter is. Things like win/loss, strength of schedule, championships, defenses all matter far more than you 'who do you like the best'.
Well you said no legacy. Even Bonnar has a small legacy with the Griffin fight. Hall of Fame means you must have some sort of significant legacy and if you think different feel free to prove me wrong.Well I argued the UFC hall of fame point. effectively I think.
The stats... I have no problem with.
That "key" win over Anderson took place after Anderson had a devastating injury, served a drug suspension and had suffered multiple brutal defeats. Anderson hadn't won a fight in 3 1/2 years. Nobody else gets credit for beating clearly past their prime legends, I'm not really sure why so many people try to rewrite history for Bisping. And while the UFC can do whatever they want with matchmaking, I'm sure as hell not playing along and pretending Hendo was a legitimate title defense. Hendo was not even a contender period, let alone the #1 contender.Bisping has been one of the most winning fighters in UFC history with key wins over Anderson Silva (who really had nothing for him outside the dirty knee) and Rockhold and defending his belt and avenging a key loss over another great who was still extremely dangerous in Hendo. And by the TS accounts he is a complete bum.
I am not a Bisping fan but the man deserves some respect. Is he an all time great MMA fighter, no. But he certainly is in the dialogue when you create a list of the top MW's in UFC history.
Hailmary? He hit Luke with that same punch multiple times. Luke Rockhold is just overrated by you. His ground game is the best part of his game. His standup game has holes and he will get highlight reeled again by someone due to those holes. The majority of Bisping's losses are to known cheaters. Who are all these shitty fighters that beat him?That hail mary vs Rocksalt was literally the only top 5 win of his career. How can he possibly be underrated
You do know the interim champ everyone drools over is a former WW right?by two guys that belong at 170?
Hailmary? He hit Luke with that same punch multiple times. Luke Rockhold is just overrated by you. His ground game is the best part of his game. His standup game has holes and he will get highlight reeled again by someone due to those holes. The majority of Bisping's losses are to known cheaters. Who are all these shitty fighters that beat him?
by you, yes. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmSo Rocksalt -- his best and only elite win -- is overrated? Hmm
by you, yes. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Luke Rocksalt. What the hell, man? lol does Rockhold suck or something to you since I told you that you overrated him?So what's Ping's best win? CB Dollaway? Cung Le?
Well you said no legacy. Even Bonnar has a small legacy with the Griffin fight. Hall of Fame means you must have some sort of significant legacy and if you think different feel free to prove me wrong.
I already shown there's more than just stats to Bisping's name.