- Joined
- Jul 26, 2016
- Messages
- 7,986
- Reaction score
- 59
It amuses me that somone called Kung fu bb likes this post.......
...and then someone called NinjaskillZ likes this post.
It amuses me that somone called Kung fu bb likes this post.......
...and then someone called NinjaskillZ likes this post.
I agree.Avoid circling with your back close to the cage like AL did.
RDA did it too against Colby who fights a similar 'push you against the cage style' that Khabib does. One of the reasons he lost.
What would be the optimal % distribution? e.g. 40% striking 40% wrestling, 20 jiu-jitsu or maybe 60% wrestling, 30% striking and 10% jiu-jitsu, etc
My brother, I like your critical thinking style and attention to detailIt amuses me that somone called Kung fu bb likes this post.......
...and then someone called NinjaskillZ likes this post.
Just defend the takedowns. Still not impressed with Khabibs striking. He showed a solid jab, but that was about it.
I like this question. This is a very tough question because he's such a well rounded guy. His striking is good only because of the constant threat of taking his opponent down. There's three strategies that I would take depending on what type of fighter I am. So let's say that each three are great at 1, and average at 2.What would be the optimal % distribution? e.g. 40% striking 40% wrestling, 20 jiu-jitsu or maybe 60% wrestling, 30% striking and 10% jiu-jitsu, etc
that's actually illegal in bjj. you cant reek.being smelly
take some guidance from lindland
I would say they should play to their own strengths, learn some take down defence. The answer to this question is different for every fighter. Connor would approach Khabin differently then Ferguson. I dont think there is an “ideal” method.It amuses me that somone called Kung fu bb likes this post.......
...and then someone called NinjaskillZ likes this post.
I like your post.I like this question. This is a very tough question because he's such a well rounded guy. His striking is good only because of the constant threat of taking his opponent down. There's three strategies that I would take depending on what type of fighter I am. So let's say that each three are great at 1, and average at 2.
For a good striker (McGregor): For Training: 30% Striking 50%wrestling 20%subs and sub defense. During the fight I'm looking to strike as much as possible and grapple only when necessary (for defense and if you rock him). So I'm looking for 70% striking, 15% wrestling just to keep him honest, and 15% sub's. Any takedown attempts would be late in a round when I know I need points.
For a good wrestler (Colby): For training: 35% Wrestling 20% Sub 45% striking: My thinking on this is that you will still need your wrestling so we can't abandon that. Being a good wrestler can put you in position to sub, but you're still going up against khabib so I wouldn't spend tons of time here. On fight day I'm looking to strike 50%, grapple 25%, sub 25%. I would only shoot for takedowns with ab less than minute left each round. Because if you do end up on your back you have less time to worry about and take punishment.
For a bjj guy (Ortega): In training I'm spending 25% of my time on bjj, and 25% TDD, and 50% striking. On fight day I'm looking 60% striking, 20% takedowns, 20% subs. This is the best style to beat khabib. Right now nobody is going to out wrestle khabib. If I'm Ortega, I strike until I prove I can't win. I'm also not worried too much about being taken down. Khabib will be a little hesitant to shoot for takedown due to fear of a nasty guillotine or other choke. If I'm losing the stand up battle, I'm looking for ways to pull guard. Generally this is a bad idea, but for a guy like Ortega there's legitimate bjj that can really slow khabib's approach.