- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Messages
- 3,922
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm thinking they do it because they want to go to whatever Heaven they believe in
Sucks to be them
Sucks to be them
At one time, like early medieval status, there may have been some benefits.
First off, people were legitimately God fearing back then.
Monasteries were one of the few places to learn to read and get an education. Obviously there were some sacrifices involved, but for those who had a desire to expand their intellectual horizons it was essentially the place to do it. In the ex western Roman empire, monasteries are credited with preserving a lot of the history and knowledge of the pre Germanic invasions world. They would literally learn Latin and spend all day copying manuscripts.
For people that were poor, there was probably an aspect of surety involved. They were essentially going to be well fed. And for those not stationed on the English coast circa 793 there was probably security and safety involved.
Monasteries in Europe are credited with making some of the best bread, cheese, beer, and wine over the centuries so there were some opportunities to pursue potentially compelling activities.
There also may have been opportunities to move up in society. Join the monastery, move up the ranks, maybe get commissioned to start another monastery or take over the current one, get crossover to some other position in the Church. Back then the Church was central to life in Europe so there was status involved.
I see you are from Ireland. I recently bought a book that discusses this very topic. "How the Irish Saved Civilization" by Thomas Cahill. It discusses the work of the monasteries and subsequent evangelism of the Irish to preserve knowledge and re-spread it throughout Europe. I have a big backlog on books so I haven't had a chance to read it yet but I'm looking forward to it.
That's a good point about Elite families sending their youngest son to join the Church. Back then, the way society worked in a lot of European countries, the eldest son inherited land and titles so there may not have been many outlets and opportunities for younger sons to prosper. Having a son with lands and titles in the secular world and having a son with position and influence in the Church provided families with a way of maximizing their prospects. As you said, it's a great way to network within positions of influence and advocate and lobby for the families interests.
Good explanation, thanks
WTF is that? I'm scared to Google itI'd rather be a monk than a nu-male.
i got you broski.WTF is that? I'm scared to Google it
Ahh like that espn commercial. Thank you kindly sir for saving me from a bout of rage.i got you broski.
"The perception is that many progressives have been trying to redefine masculinity, or are against traditional masculine traits and roles. So, we have "new male" or "numale" (as in "nu-metal". The spelling is part of the insult)".
LMFAO!
You get to touch little boys and still go to heaven.
This applies to Buddhist monks:
The core tenet of Buddhism is the 4 noble truths: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Noble_Truths
The takeaway I mainly get is that a lot of our psychological suffering comes from desires unfulfilled. But these desires are not essential, and often a hindrance to a life of enlightenment. A life of abstinence cuts through all the consumerism bs and allow one to have a better possibility to gain an insight into how to live a meaningful life.
i got you broski.
"The perception is that many progressives have been trying to redefine masculinity, or are against traditional masculine traits and roles. So, we have "new male" or "numale" (as in "nu-metal". The spelling is part of the insult)".
LMFAO!