what do we know?
a) Jones previously tested + for PEDs
b) it went to arbitration
c) arbitration agreed he did it accidentally
d) arbitration still have him the max punishment allowable, because although he did it accidentally, he's (and i'm now paraphrasing) a fucking idiot for putting himself into that situation
e) a few years later, Jones tested + for PEDs
f) a few months after that, Jeff Novitsky suggested that evidence may indicate that he ingested them not on purpose
g) Jeff Novitsky also indicated his own personal opinions have nothing to do with it, it's between USADA and Jones
these are the facts (ordered them with some semblance of bias). with all that, please explain to me why you believe he will get a short sentence for his second accidental offense than his first.
or gracelessly out of this whole discussion with a one liner quip. up to you. cheers.