- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 10,949
- Reaction score
- 1,331
Beats blanket statements about middle schoolers.I hate these kinds of blanked, uneducated statements on history.
Beats blanket statements about middle schoolers.I hate these kinds of blanked, uneducated statements on history.
heya Quipling,
is that right?
i have to go reread my history, but wasn't Khan a visionary in his time? i thought i remembered reading accounts of how he incorporated the locals to govern as he marauded through Asia.
They readily adopted the system of administration of the conquered states, placing a handful of Mongols in the top positions but allowing former local officials to run everyday affairs.
This clever system allowed them to control each city and province but also to be in touch with the population through their administrators.
https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/khan1/hd_khan1.htm
- IGIT
If the West fought the Af-Pak war like how they fought during the time of colonialism, then the war would have been over. Now , someone will chime in and say the Brits never defeated Afghan tribes, but that kinda ignores the fact the Brits didn't really care about them much because there was nothing worth taking. From the Near East to South Asia and beyond, the Brits destroyed and dominated cultures because they didn't fight by today's rules of engagement and care about human rights. If the West fought like the Taleban, Al Qaeda, ISIS - then the West could destroy Jihadists. When Britain controlled Iraq in the era of colonialism and vied with the Russians in Syria, the British used chemical weapons.
Note: most modern historians think nishapur is exaggerated by a lot. It was smaller than Merv, which was nearly exterminated. After a week-long siege and surrender, no less.The Mongols would ask a city or people to surrender before they attacked. If the city agreed to surrender they would be allowed to live. If the city refused to surrender they would be wiped out. This was a scenario that was common in the ancient world and many people's understood this to be how things worked. When the Mongols attacked Baghdad, they asked for Baghdad to surrender. The city refused and when the Mongols attacked and won the city they practically wiped out the population. I'm not exactly sure what the population was, something like two million residents. The city didn't recover an equivalent population until something like the 1700's.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_Empire
According to this ^^^, the population of China was halved from 120 million to 60 million in the 13th and 14th centuries (although some claim many Chinese fled south and lived unregistered). The population of Persia may have been reduced from 2.5 million to 250,000. It's estimated that half of the population of the Kievan Rus died as a result of the Mongol invasion and that Hungary lost half its population, or 1 million people.
The oasis city of Merv had 700,000 people killed while the city of Nishapur had 1 million killed.
Beats blanket statements about middle schoolers.
The Mongols would ask a city or people to surrender before they attacked. If the city agreed to surrender they would be allowed to live. If the city refused to surrender they would be wiped out. This was a scenario that was common in the ancient world and many people's understood this to be how things worked. When the Mongols attacked Baghdad, they asked for Baghdad to surrender. The city refused and when the Mongols attacked and won the city they practically wiped out the population. I'm not exactly sure what the population was, something like two million residents. The city didn't recover an equivalent population until something like the 1700's.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_Empire
According to this ^^^, the population of China was halved from 120 million to 60 million in the 13th and 14th centuries (although some claim many Chinese fled south and lived unregistered). The population of Persia may have been reduced from 2.5 million to 250,000. It's estimated that half of the population of the Kievan Rus died as a result of the Mongol invasion and that Hungary lost half its population, or 1 million people.
The oasis city of Merv had 700,000 people killed while the city of Nishapur had 1 million killed.
Hey @Bloodworth, what the fuck is this thread actually about?
Which past? Where? There were cultures in the past who had a more ritualized concept of war, like several celtic and Native American tribes. Those would count as "more compassionate" in the sense that they didn't commit genocide.So you believe war was more compassionate in the past, then today?
Just because truth hurts, doesn't mean you have to get triggered.
Hey @Bloodworth, what the fuck is this thread actually about?
This thread is stupid, and you should feel bad. You can't compare modern times and armies to ancient ones. Also, you have no understanding of history or the world at large, and your OP is a huge pile of shit.In 2018 which groups would no longer be around if wars were alalways fought like ghengis Kahn or the Persians.
Who would be the leading invader?
Any opinions?
Do you mean what civilizations have already been wiped out 1000 years ago?
The Trojans were wiped out unless you believe the Romans are actually Trojan refugees, but that is much more than a 1000 years.
There is also the Dzungars who the chinese genocided, but the Chinese did not kill their women and children. Instead the Chinese took them in.
The Jews have had their asses served back to them on a plate a multitude of times over these past 1000 years and before. The Jews have been the punching bag of Europe and ME for a long time.
The Persians tolerated different religions and didn't massacre everyone they encountered, no.In 2018 which groups would no longer be around if wars were alalways fought like ghengis Kahn or the Persians.
Who would be the leading invader?
Any opinions?
This thread is stupid, and you should feel bad. You can't compare modern times and armies to ancient ones. Also, you have no understanding of history or the world at large, and your OP is a huge pile of shit.
We all know what you're driving at, and we don't care because it's idiotic. Go somewhere else if you want to fantasize about eradicating Muslims, etc.
The Persians tolerated different religions and didn't massacre everyone they encountered, no.
So if the global mentality was that of a general in a Rome total war game, everyone would get nuked and we're all dead, the end.Not taking about modern times. Just what the world would look like today if the times of invade , conquer, and kill all never stopped .
In 2018 which groups would no longer be around if wars were alalways fought like ghengis Kahn or the Persians.
Who would be the leading invader?
Any opinions?
hi Bloodworth,
i gotta head to work, but off the top of my head i gotta figure that the Japanese would no longer exist - outside of zoos and sanctuaries - because a President Khan would have unloaded a fusillade of atomic bombs on the island.
- IGIT