whaaaa! I'm a 70 yr old woman child, and refuse to go away - Clinton

Can explain why they should have given Bernie equal treatment for deciding to be a Democrat for 6 months of his life?

The Democrats built a billion dollar house over decades of effort and you think they should just let someone else move into it?

Yeah, that they shouldn't treat their private country club, as a private country club, unless they want the American people, to treat them like a private, for profit, country club.
 
Yeah, that they shouldn't treat their private country club, as a private country club, unless they want the American people, to treat them like a private, for profit, country club.

We're talking about an election committee, not a club.
 
Keep digging that already unpopular hole deeper Killary............
 
Lmao at the Hillary/DNC defenders in this thread. They still make you?
 
VivaRevolution the Howard Zinn/Bernie Sanders poster has been promoted to "right-wing" by Jack V Savage because he correctly predicted Hillary losing via voter apathy. In turn Jack has been taken to mentoring Rational Poster, a teenager who was asking us to explain the electorate to him a few months ago before entering his current "fiery progressive" phase.

He's got at least 2 years of mileage before he knows too much, starts making "non-party" (aka quantitative) observations and liberal Palpatine needs to replace him.
 
We're talking about a political party that should be trying to appeal to all americans, not excluding them.

They appealed to more Americans than any other candidate or political party by millions of votes.
 
we don't use popular vote, check the Constitution.

No shit, but if you want to quantify how many people the message appealed to, it's quite obvious that the DNC's message appealed to more people than anyone else.

It's basic math.

It appealed to millions more people. Just because they don't live in the right states is irrelevant to this discussion.
 
No shit, but if you want to quantify how many people the message appealed to, it's quite obvious that the DNC's message appealed to more people than anyone else.

It's basic math.

It appealed to millions more people.

You are here forth dubbed rationalization poster.
 
You are here forth dubbed rationalization poster.

I am not talking about winning or losing the election, you made the claim that they couldn't appeal to all Americans.

We both know that isn't true because she earned millions of more individual votes than both Bernie and Trump.

She even earned more votes than Obama when she ran against him.
 
I am not talking about winning or losing the election, you made the claim that they couldn't appeal to all Americans.

We both know that isn't true because she earned millions of more individual votes than both Bernie and Trump.

She even earned more votes than Obama when she ran against him.

This would be more of a legit point if she didn't lose to a orange circus clown.

I mean you lose to Romney or McCain, and your point holds some merit.

You lose to Donald trump, then something has gone terribly wrong within the DNC.
 
No shit, but if you want to quantify how many people the message appealed to, it's quite obvious that the DNC's message appealed to more people than anyone else.

It's basic math.

It appealed to millions more people. Just because they don't live in the right states is irrelevant to this discussion.


yes, but the extra people that voted for hillary weren't eligible to vote, because they're illegal aliens.
 
Back
Top