WH leaks about to be plugged?

[Bloody Pulp]

Apparently Yingst is the WH correspondent for the One America News Network, which im not familiar with, but the story seems to indicate a few staffers have been identified and will be getting axed when Trump returns and possibly charged?

​

 

[Orgasmo]

Plugging the leak? So Donald will finally shut his mouth and get off Twitter?

 

[TheStruggle]

If they have been leaking classified information, just should be charged

 

[Bloody Pulp]

Plugging the leak? Donald will shut his mouth and get off Twitter?

 

[HomerThompson]

If they have been leaking classified information, just should be charged

Do you hold the President to this same standard?

 

[pinger]

If they have been leaking classified information, just should be charged

I am sorry but if you part of a professional staff protecting the office of the president you shut your fucking mouth and do your job.

 

[Bloody Pulp]

Do you hold the President to this same standard?

Pro tip: the President decides what's classified.

 

[TheStruggle]

Do you hold the President to this same standard?

The president is the one who can classify and declassify what he wants, not butthurt staffers

 

[bobgeese]

Nice.

 

[HomerThompson]

The president is the one who can classify and declassify what he wants, not butthurt staffers

So, that's a no then.

 

[STEVEN SEAGOLD]

So, that's a no then.

Home run Thompson.

 

[HomerThompson]

If they have been leaking classified information, just should be charged

Bootlicking authority in this thread and advocating for smaller government in your other thread. Somehow, I don't think you've actually thought your positions through here.

 

[Bloody Pulp]

So, that's a no then.

Correct, cause it's not remotely close to the same standard. The president > random staffer.

One is the person expressly allowed to do it and the other is not.

 

[second sight]

axed as in hillary style or just "you're fired"

 

[TheStruggle]

So, that's a no then.

Just because you don't know how government works doesn't mean your false equivalencies are correct

 

[TheStruggle]

Bootlicking authority in this thread and advocating for smaller government in your other thread. Somehow, I don't think you've actually thought your positions through here.

Understanding the powers of the president ≠ Bootlicking

 

[Bloody Pulp]

axed as in hillary style or just "you're fired"

Time will tell.

 

[HomerThompson]

Correct, cause it's not remotely close to the same standard. The president > random staffer.

One is the person expressly allowed to do it and the other is not.

It's stupid not to hold the President accountable for giving classified information to a hostile nation like Russia. It's not like he decided to change something's classification and release it to the public. Not to mention that whistleblowers/leakers could release information that is later classified in order to prosecute them. It's atrociously bad reasoning.

 

[HomerThompson]

Just because you don't know how government works doesn't mean your false equivalencies are correct

I know very well how it works.

 

[Bloody Pulp]

It's stupid not to hold the President accountable for giving classified information to a hostile nation like Russia. It's not like he decided to change something's classification and release it to the public. Not to mention that whistleblowers/leakers could release information that is later classified in order to prosecute them. It's atrociously bad reasoning.