We Did Not Evolve

Status
Not open for further replies.
i have studied evelutionwe got forced to) so i know some about it.If i go through bioligy and find out im wrong fine ill admit it i promise but i know i wont find out im wrong.ill try to learn tats what i have been doing. On Gods authority im making the claim. Like i said God is all powerful and he could make things all different but our minds cant interpret it and thas why there are simular characteristics.With all do respect, i believe you are the one who should try and learn.
Are you spelling things wrong on purpose?

And I can't get over how you arrogantly boast about your ignorance.
 
Good video. I would love to hear the response on that one. Anybody? Anybody have gods explanation for that?
 
Vestigial Structures: Evidence of evolution, not a common designer
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pY5r05I1w_w&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pY5r05I1w_w&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>
 
ouuuuur god is an awe-some god heeee reignnnnnns!!!!
 
naturespirit, please watch this video or read the following link and tell me either the four (video) or five (link) types of evidence for evolution:

<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9GEh1u5fF4M&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9GEh1u5fF4M&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>

Link.
 
Listen to the scientists!
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bV4_lVTVa6k&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bV4_lVTVa6k&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>
 
Right of course. There are two types of tigers also, male and female. But theres bengal tigers, caspian tigers, siberian tigers to name a few. Im not sure that I get your point. Are you insisting that Neanderthals aren't related to us in any way shape or form? Im having a tough time deciphering your post because of all the typos. Elaborate please.

Sorry about the typos, trying to have your bro type while you do eight other things doesnt work. I wanted to be a smart alec thats why i put that. There are many types of tygers like you named but are they they same besides coloring, size, some of what they do and where they live? It is the same as humans, there are africans hispanics, russians ect. but we are the same besides the aspects i posted above.




Watch this:
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BXdQRvSdLAs&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BXdQRvSdLAs&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>


Sorry i cant watch this. My computer is stupid and wont let me.



naturespirit, please watch this video or read the following link and tell me either the four (video) or five (link) types of evidence for evolution:

<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9GEh1u5fF4M&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9GEh1u5fF4M&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>

Link.

I promise ill read the link when i get back but i need to go to school at the moment so i dont have time but i will get a chance.
 
Mutations are never positive and always get weeded out eventually. They do not continue. This has been proved with all the substantial fruit fly experiments.
 
Vestigial Structures: Evidence of evolution, not a common designer
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pY5r05I1w_w&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pY5r05I1w_w&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>

By fuck, the guy in this video is such an annoying twat and he has nothing of any substance to say whatsoever.
Yeah, lets all watch some nerd with his baseball cap on backwards because he must know so much about this subject.
Just what point is it that this penis raises that is worth looking at and has not been addressed by someone who is actually clued up on the subject? His arguments are like those of a child.

So if it is indeed possible for god to have always existed, why is it not possible for energy or matter to have always existed?

Because energy and matter are not the I AM.

Before time,before space and before matter, there was the I AM. There was nothing else.
He was what was and that was all that was. There was nothing else.

(Does anyone here actually believe that time, space and matter have always existed? I have not heard anyone admit it, ever).
 
It's been proved that the universe is running down. Which means that matter, space etc... hasn't actually always existed but had a beginning. This is why the Big bang theory and intelligent design and creation are the only real prevailant theories left.
 
I don't think anyone actually believes for a second that T+S+M has always existed. And seeing as no one seems to believe it, why do they bother mentioning it?
Is it their silly way of saying that because it couldn't have always existed, neither could God?
But hey, nothing exploded and created everything, by itself and without reason and it was nowhere.The 'everything' then gave birth for no reason. OK then.

Do we really need a scientists 'expert' opinion to know how stupid this all sounds?

*Can someone clear something up for me. The twat in the video above (baseball cap nerd) waffles on about humans having the exact same amount of hair follicules as apes. How can that be when not even all humans have the same amount as each other? Just wondering. Or is the reason because the atheist fundamentalist posted it so it doesn't have to be true or make sense?*
 
BLONDE - 140,000 strands
BROWN - 110,000 strands
BLACK - 108,000 strands
RED - 90,000 strands


I think that's in the Bible. Also Math 10:30 states that every hair on your head is numbered.
 
*Pandas thumb? LOL. I have never heard this point before but the obvious initial point I have to point out is this. What does the panda use that abnormal 'thumb' for? Bamboo. Now, what does the pandas diet consist of? Bamboo.
If I have moved too fast or you want me to explain that again let me know. I'll be glad to go over it again for any stupid atheist fundamentalists that are slight in brain power*
 
*Pandas thumb? LOL. I have never heard this point before but the obvious initial point I have to point out is this. What does the panda use that abnormal 'thumb' for? Bamboo. Now, what does the pandas diet consist of? Bamboo.
If I have moved too fast or you want me to explain that again let me know. I'll be glad to go over it again for any stupid atheist fundamentalists that are slight in brain power*

You are correct sir. It does eat bamboo. And over time it grew this thumb to better suit its eating habits. A sixth thumb, like no other bear possesses. Coincidentally, other bears don't eat bamboo.What part of this do you disagree with?
 
BLONDE - 140,000 strands
BROWN - 110,000 strands
BLACK - 108,000 strands
RED - 90,000 strands


I think that's in the Bible. Also Math 10:30 states that every hair on your head is numbered.

What part is in the bible? Those numbers up there, what are they supposed to mean.

And as for every hair on your head being numbered, that doesn't address the point that we share the same number of hair follicles with apes, nor does it serve to explain the "coincidence", if indeed you think it's just coincidence.
 
I don't think anyone actually believes for a second that T+S+M has always existed. And seeing as no one seems to believe it, why do they bother mentioning it?
Is it their silly way of saying that because it couldn't have always existed, neither could God?
But hey, nothing exploded and created everything, by itself and without reason and it was nowhere.The 'everything' then gave birth for no reason. OK then.

Do we really need a scientists 'expert' opinion to know how stupid this all sounds?

*Can someone clear something up for me. The twat in the video above (baseball cap nerd) waffles on about humans having the exact same amount of hair follicules as apes. How can that be when not even all humans have the same amount as each other? Just wondering. Or is the reason because the atheist fundamentalist posted it so it doesn't have to be true or make sense?*

Cant really argue time, space, and matter. Haven't delved into it that much yet. But saying it sounds stupid is just your opinion. It sounds no more stupid then creationism does. And I believe the original point is that if god could always exist, then why couldn't the universe?

And the only thing that varies in humans is the thickness, length, and color of the hair. But the number of follicles remains the same. If you look at just about any part of the human body under magnification, there is indeed hair on it, and even fine hairs barely visible require follicles.
 
By fuck, the guy in this video is such an annoying twat and he has nothing of any substance to say whatsoever.
Yeah, lets all watch some nerd with his baseball cap on backwards because he must know so much about this subject.
Just what point is it that this penis raises that is worth looking at and has not been addressed by someone who is actually clued up on the subject? His arguments are like those of a child.

Because energy and matter are not the I AM.

Before time,before space and before matter, there was the I AM. There was nothing else.
He was what was and that was all that was. There was nothing else.

(Does anyone here actually believe that time, space and matter have always existed? I have not heard anyone admit it, ever).


Yes, the guy is a goober. But making fun of him doesn't serve to address the point he made. You seem very agitated, as if his video was directed at you. And if his point on the hair follicle issue has already been addressed by someone who is clued up on the subject, I would like to see the link and check out the rebuttal. I'll be waiting for that one. And I'm also waiting on an explanation of the panda thumb.
 
our hair doesn't even remotely grow like an ape much less resemble an ape's

Theirs is thicker, more coarse. But the number of follicles is the same. How do you explain this?We also share the exact same dental arrangement, exclusive to apes and humans. Hominid fossils also have the same arrangement. Watch the video, they go into better detail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top