Washington Post Retracts Article Calling Other Sites 'Russian Propaganda' and 'Fake News'

TheStruggle

Yellow Card
Banned
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Messages
28,152
Reaction score
2
In an attempt to link Donald Trump and multiple online publications to Vladimir Putin and the new liberal buzzword 'fake news', The left-wing Washington Post posted 'fake news' by falsely claiming that multiple sites were working for the Russians to undermine democracy and elect Donald Trump. Turns out many websites are now threatening the Washington Post with legal action due their baseless claims that they are 'fake news' which has forced the WP to retract multiple articles and write an editor's note which discredits the piece they already published to millions of readers.




Editor’s Note: The Washington Post on Nov. 24 published a story on the work of four sets of researchers who have examined what they say are Russian propaganda efforts to undermine American democracy and interests. One of them was PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity, which issued a report identifying more than 200 websites that, in its view, wittingly or unwittingly published or echoed Russian propaganda. A number of those sites have objected to being included on PropOrNot’s list, and some of the sites, as well as others not on the list, have publicly challenged the group’s methodology and conclusions. The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media outlet, nor did the article purport to do so. Since publication of The Post’s story, PropOrNot has removed some sites from its list.

Correction: A previously published version of this story incorrectly stated that Russian information service RT had used the “#CrookedHillary” hastag pushed by then-Republican candidate Donald Trump. In fact, while another Russian information service Sputnik did use this hashtag, RT did not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...16af66098fe_story.html?utm_term=.58f6d013c980



This is not the first time the Washington Post has posted fake news. 5 years ago the Washington Post posted an article claiming Mitt Romney was doing KKK salutes at his rallies to push a "Romney is racist" angle in order to help Barack Obama re-election bid, that also caused a major retraction from the WP who wrote



Editors’ note: This posting contains multiple, serious factual errors that undermine its premise. Mitt Romney is not using “Keep America American,” which was once a KKK slogan, as a catchphrase in stump speeches, as the posting and headline stated. In a YouTube video that the posting said showed Romney using the phrase, Romney actually used a different phrase, “Keep America America.” Further, the video that the blog posting labelled “Mitt Romney 2012 Campaign Ad” is not actually a Romney campaign ad. The video itself states “Mitt Romney does not actually support this ad.” The posting cited accounts of Romney saying “keep America American” at an appearance last week. Independent video from the event shows him saying “Keep America America.” The Post should have contacted the Romney campaign for comment before publication. Finally, we apologize that the posting began by saying “
omeone didn’t do his research” when, in fact, we had not done ours.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...4/gIQAXD6OuO_blog.html?utm_term=.7c664b58017e




So tell me again, who is the fake news now?
 
Lol..the mainstream media has no chill.

They just can't stand that they unloaded their arsenal and lost.

The Editor Note Times, The failing NY times and the rest of the dishonest media are in free fall.

I'm also waiting for a reason why we hate Putin. Hey Obama, the eighties called...
 
The lying fucks are calling everyone else liars and are pissed the public has gotten wise to their game.

lol, fuck them all.
 
It's called accountability. They fucked up and owned it. All of you trying to claim the MSM is "fake news" are sheep bleating the alt-right line. The difference is accountability - your disinformation/propaganda "news" has zero accountability - fly by night nobodies make shit up and then disappear. Nothing on the line, nothing at stake. Has any site that offered up the CT headlines from the election admitted any mistake in pushing the trash? Of course not. Because that is their purpose. Sell the rubes on bullshit.
 
Lately I noticed that a couple of French MSM also started the war against "fake news websites".

Seems like western medias can't digest Trump's election.
 
Lmao at the Romney story. That sort of says it all though. They and other Democrat party organs contributed to the rise of Trump in their own way. They pushed a narrative that guys like Romney and McCain were Nazis, so by the time Trump came around a lot of people were desensitized to that shit. Even a smug prick like Maher could recognize that.
 
Honestly if you want evidence of just how neocon those backing Hilary actually are you need look no further than there resorting to McCarthyist reds under the bed tactics.
 
It's called accountability. They fucked up and owned it. All of you trying to claim the MSM is "fake news" are sheep bleating the alt-right line. The difference is accountability - your disinformation/propaganda "news" has zero accountability - fly by night nobodies make shit up and then disappear. Nothing on the line, nothing at stake. Has any site that offered up the CT headlines from the election admitted any mistake in pushing the trash? Of course not. Because that is their purpose. Sell the rubes on bullshit.


'fake news', 'alt-right', 'Russian propaganda'

All buzzwords created by the MSM and the democrats create hysteria and deflect any negative press about them. Who's selling who again?
 
Retractions don't do anything. The only time an article is read (and the ad money and the headline on social media to push public opinion and perception of truth) matters is the day it's publish and the link seen on Facebook and twitter.
 
It's called accountability. They fucked up and owned it. All of you trying to claim the MSM is "fake news" are sheep bleating the alt-right line. The difference is accountability - your disinformation/propaganda "news" has zero accountability - fly by night nobodies make shit up and then disappear. Nothing on the line, nothing at stake. Has any site that offered up the CT headlines from the election admitted any mistake in pushing the trash? Of course not. Because that is their purpose. Sell the rubes on bullshit.

Yea but the question is did they fuck up on purpose knowing that they could just "own up" to it later after the damage is done?
 
Yea but the question is did they fuck up on purpose knowing that they could just "own up" to it later after the damage is done?
I don't think the likes of the WaPo fucks up on purpose because the hit they suffer is worse than any one story, and what would their motive be - it's not like they leaked something pre-election or something (Ie pull a Comey). What damage was done?
 
Yeah, after being threatened with a million lawsuits. How honorable of them.
See accountability. Either by the public, or in the courts. Good luck suing the misinformation/propaganda smear merchants who cook up the Facebook fake news or Comet Ping Pong conspiracy theories. If you can find them, their likely broke ass fools anyways.
 
I don't think the likes of the WaPo fucks up on purpose because the hit they suffer is worse than any one story, and what would their motive be - it's not like they leaked something pre-election or something (Ie pull a Comey). What damage was done?



Because all the other MSM stooges run with the story and pass it around with each other and no one will ever read the retraction. Just like the Romney story, the damage is already done and they know that, but they didn't care to fact check until every other news site had run with their story. These are the people complaining about 'fake news'
 
I don't think the likes of the WaPo fucks up on purpose because the hit they suffer is worse than any one story, and what would their motive be - it's not like they leaked something pre-election or something (Ie pull a Comey). What damage was done?

Well in the case of the Romney report it could have been to discredit Romney before the election. Chances are small they are doing this on purpose because like you said the damage it does but just spit ballin.
 
'fake news', 'alt-right', 'Russian propaganda'

All buzzwords created by the MSM and the democrats create hysteria and deflect any negative press about them. Who's selling who again?
Literally none of those are buzzwords. They're all phrases Also, Alt-right was coined by Richard Spencer, whom to my knowledge, is not part of the mainstream media.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
See accountability. Either by the public, or in the courts. Good luck suing the misinformation/propaganda smear merchants who cook up the Facebook fake news or Comet Ping Pong conspiracy theories. If you can find them, their likely broke ass fools anyways.

LOL @ your broke ass logic.

The WP are retracting statements they made about some of those "smear merchants", for fear of being sued by them. What the fuck does that have to do with anything you just posted? Are you saying the WP couldn't sue them, or something? What the hell are you even talking about? Are you even saying anything here, or are you making a completely irrelevant statement, because your poor Liberal mind has been smashed since November 9th?
 
Just watched a skit in fox news how people watching fake news is dangerous to OTHERS.

Sounded like some orwell stuff, they ended the skit with "fox news all the time, thats right"
 
Back
Top