- Joined
- Nov 12, 2009
- Messages
- 76,917
- Reaction score
- 17,505
SilencerCo Saker Trifecta. Getting one I from a suppressor company specifically for "future proofing"Hope you don't change your mind once it's on there. Which device you going with?
SilencerCo Saker Trifecta. Getting one I from a suppressor company specifically for "future proofing"Hope you don't change your mind once it's on there. Which device you going with?
SilencerCo Saker Trifecta. Getting one I from a suppressor company specifically for "future proofing"
Yup.So it's a mount too?
I sincerely hope that the 2020 election comes down to Trump and Warren. It's a joy to watch her destroy greedy, incompetent 1-percenters.
Anyone watched those old '90s documentaries, The World at War and The Cold War?
While the narratives are the sort of shallow overview you'd expect from a TV documentary (compared to reading any halfway decent book on the material), they really do have some excellent interviews with key figures which make them worth watching.
I've had them on in the background while I'm working this week and it's been very interesting.
I wonder about the producers though, because the Cold War series is relatively neutral up until it starts to deal with South America. At which point it becomes extremely critical of the US (ie Interview of a CIA guy saying all the civilians shot in the Allende coup, "were bad people" interposed with the widow of Victor Jara talking about his last moments. Similarly an interview with a McCarthy era CIA agent talking about how the democratic elections of left-wing leaders were all communist conspiracies, interspersed with a KGB agent of the time saying the USSR didn't even have diplomatic relations with these particular South American groups). Fair enough the episodes covered are no doubt amongst the worst of the US cold war sins, but the sudden shift seemed like it might be personal.
I won't pretend to be impartial, but it's always been very hard for me to render any understanding of America's Cold War-era involvement in Latin America that doesn't cast the US as a villain. It seems like you really have to go balls deep on the "but muh Soviet evil" paranoia to even attempt to justify the US's actions.
Trump's chances against Warren are slim to none.A Trump vs Warren matchup would be a dream come true for my side. Trust me, you guys don't want that.
I say bring it.Trump's chances against Warren are slim to none.
Maybe we'll find out. The debates would be fun.I say bring it.
Oh no doubt!Maybe we'll find out. The debates would be fun.
So is @waiguoren revealing that his whole account was a troll and he's leaving the WR for good or is it just the weird sexual stuff and the white nationalism? Or is it something more limited?
This smells like embarrassment over being trolled."Jokes on you guys! I was only pretending to be retarded!"
Bad look, duder. Bad look lol. I mean, it's your only option, so I understand, but still.
You know folks, if there's one bit of wisdom I've picked up in all my years it's that no one is EVER "just kidding".
Besides that's a bad out wai, you'd have been better off copping to digging submissive little-girl boys than copping to being a troll, ouch man.
Oh somethin smells alrightThis smells like embarrassment over being trolled.
But seriously, you can take the "sexually liberated" attorneys. Go wild.
Yeah he's going all inOh sweetie
What pickle did I get myself into? I'm quite happy with everything I posted.Oh somethin smells alright
Damn, dawg
You got yerself in a pickle here, no doubt, and I get the only way to try and save face is to plead trolling. The way to avoid this in the future is to qualify from the start, rather than springing the ol "you've fallen for my deliberate retardation trap!" card.