War on poverty.

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by NC252, Jul 14, 2017.

  1. NC252 Blue Belt

    NC252
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2016
    Messages:
    506
    Likes Received:
    216
    President Johnson declared war on poverty in 1964. Since then we have spent over 22 trillion dollars to fight the war on poverty. That is more than have spent on all of our military interventions (real wars ) combined since the American Revolution. Could this money have been better spent somewhere else? (Infrastructure?) Would the poverty rate still be at 15% as it is now or would it have skyrocketed? Not sure of the answer but I think that without the social programs that we now have (welfare, food stamps, public housing, etc....), we would still have the same 15% poverty rate. And we would have 23 trillion more dollars!! What say you?
    http://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/the-war-poverty-50-years-failure
     
    #1
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2017
  2. Newave White Belt

    Newave
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    147
    I'm no supporter of welfare but I honestly do wonder if without it the US would be like Brazil or South Africa with very wealthy gated areas on one side of a city and the most frightening slums on the other side with insane crime and murder rates. Sure our cities have our problems but nothing like Rio or Capetown.

    Overall it's pointless to think about. I can hardly agree with my wife, who is my soul mate, on anything. How do you expect to agree with 300 million other people on what to do about poverty and spending? Just worry about you and your own and concentrate on making so much money that the tax rate doesn't even bother you. Life is short, go surf on a Friday like I'm about to, instead of thinking about this shit.
     
    #2
    Kafir-kun, ManCityFC9 and NC252 like this.
  3. NC252 Blue Belt

    NC252
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2016
    Messages:
    506
    Likes Received:
    216
    You may be right. But if 23 trillion in 53 years doesn't make a dent in the numbers percentage wise, who knows? But you are pointing to the severity of the poverty of the 15% which is something I have not considered.
     
    #3
  4. Captain Davis Senior Flatulator

    Captain Davis
    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    22,279
    Likes Received:
    13,944
    Location:
    Where my hose at?
    You sound poor.
     
    #4
  5. Z28LS1L98 Blue Belt

    Z28LS1L98
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    678
    Likes Received:
    826
    Welfare makes people lazy as fuck. No doubt some people realy do need it. But it needs to be reformed and regulated. It's out of control. I know a lot of people that abuse it and it pisses the fuck out of me. You can't compare Brazil to the U.S bro. Here u can make money out of anything.
     
    #5
    NC252 likes this.
  6. Jack V Savage Funklord of the USA and the Nicest Guy on Sherdog

    Jack V Savage
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    56,047
    Likes Received:
    14,114
    Poverty is a flow. Measured by annual income. You can't spend money in 1976 to reduce it in 1994. OP is incoherent.
     
    #6
    kpt018, M3t4tr0n, Kafir-kun and 2 others like this.
  7. NC252 Blue Belt

    NC252
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2016
    Messages:
    506
    Likes Received:
    216
    What the ### are you talking about?
     
    #7
  8. Jack V Savage Funklord of the USA and the Nicest Guy on Sherdog

    Jack V Savage
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    56,047
    Likes Received:
    14,114
    What word or words did you not understand?
     
    #8
    KONG-D'SNT-TAP likes this.
  9. lecter not even webscale

    lecter
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    11,278
    Likes Received:
    28,716
    We should fight a war against the poor instead
     
    #9
    Kafir-kun and JbModest like this.
  10. helltoupee Brown Belt

    helltoupee
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2015
    Messages:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    4,634
    Location:
    on one wheel
    LOL. What an ironic comment.
     
    #10
  11. TSO Silver Belt

    TSO
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    10,966
    Likes Received:
    1,937
    Location:
    Kings Landing
    If we had spent all that money on infrastructure there'd be no need for welfare because all those poor people would be working trades. Trades pay very well. If there are jobs available and you're able bodied and still wont work, you should be turned into fertilizer.
     
    #11
    NC252 and Pwent like this.
  12. Jack V Savage Funklord of the USA and the Nicest Guy on Sherdog

    Jack V Savage
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    56,047
    Likes Received:
    14,114
    Poverty is more about no income than low income. The vast majority of people with pre-transfer below-poverty incomes in any year are kids, the elderly, and the disabled. Other big groups are college students, unpaid caretakers, and people who temporarily were without work during the year. No amount of infrastructure spending would change the fact that large percentages of people in those groups will not have above-poverty market incomes.
     
    #12
    kpt018 and Kafir-kun like this.
  13. the ambush Black Belt

    the ambush
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    5,945
    Likes Received:
    1,535
    Location:
    a cardboard box
    IMO a mandatory urinalysis/piss test is justified in this scenario. If a person is in need of a welfare check then provide a sample.
     
    #13
    Z28LS1L98 likes this.
  14. TSO Silver Belt

    TSO
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    10,966
    Likes Received:
    1,937
    Location:
    Kings Landing
    Solved by investing in infrastructure creating jobs
    Pointing out classes of people that need caretakers is not an argument for welfare
    I worked my way through school, if you're poor and in school drop out, you can't handle life.
    That is the exact opposite of how it works. The best rout out of poverty is having a job, infrastructure is almost exclusively trade work and pays very well. So investing in infrastructure puts people to work and as an effect of that ends poverty.
     
    #14
    Huked on foniks and NC252 like this.
  15. DynamicLoosener Grass Fed Free Range Dolce Belt

    DynamicLoosener
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Messages:
    9,273
    Likes Received:
    10,055
    Location:
    Bubbles Depo
    I have offered to people I know that need money to show them how to make AT LEAST! an extra $100 every week and they always make an excuse why they cant. That great american cant do attitude.
     
    #15
    mike sherry and Liquid Smoke like this.
  16. Orgasmo Yellow Card

    Orgasmo
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
    Messages:
    7,525
    Likes Received:
    6,921
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Winning the war on poverty by taking away healthcare from the poor and elderly, so they have to bankrupt themselves treating sickness. Add a little sprinkle of trickle down economics to squeeze the middle class back to poor peasants through taxation and inflation.
     
    #16
    Kafir-kun and ultramanhyata like this.
  17. HIMBOB Steel Belt

    HIMBOB
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Messages:
    28,775
    Likes Received:
    4,701
    Just think of all those great countries that don't have welfare......

    Starving people will do fucked up things. I wouldn't live anywhere that didn't have it, not that I think I will ever use it.


    Let alone my single mother was once on welfare while raising us. She received about 20k in total, fast forward 25 years and each year her kids pay over 60k in income tax.

    To me the idea of simply removing welfare is more retarded than thinking it is perfectly administrated.
     
    #17
    M3t4tr0n, Kafir-kun and steve38 like this.
  18. hillelslovak87 Red Belt

    hillelslovak87
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2017
    Messages:
    7,739
    Likes Received:
    10,134
    Location:
    Now this is pod racing!!!
    Fuck that, then you have to touch them. Make them fight each other, give Tina Turner something to do.
    [​IMG]
     
    #18
    Kafir-kun, HeLLMuTT and lecter like this.
  19. Jack V Savage Funklord of the USA and the Nicest Guy on Sherdog

    Jack V Savage
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    56,047
    Likes Received:
    14,114
    More infrastructure won't change the percentage of kids, disabled, elderly people, and college students without jobs. It won't change the fact that in a dynamic, growing economy, there will always be some transitional unemployment (note that we deliberately target an unemployment rate of about 5% to keep inflation in check). So, yes, it absolutely is an argument for some form of safety net.

    Poverty in the developed world is mostly a life cycle issue. Also, even with full employment (which we're pretty close to now), a quarter to a third of the population will be in poverty absent transfer payments because of the way market income distribution works. That's why every country with a market-based income-distribution system has independently developed a safety net.
     
    #19
    Kafir-kun likes this.
  20. ehtheist #FreeBanchan

    ehtheist
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,322
    Likes Received:
    7,565
    [​IMG]
     
    #20
    Kafir-kun likes this.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "fd5733925866a04e50edd70f38dfaa35"
monitoring_string = "603ac9fff68f23709f2a42bf5e29272b"