- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 35,409
- Reaction score
- 38,547
He hasn't done anything impressive, IMO. Modern-day UFC fans just cling to anyone who they feel is "mistreated"
It's not a detractor either.Usman doesn't have any notable win and it is actually very common for top fighters to not be interested in fighting dudes ranked below them and who have zero drawing power. The situation sucks for him and he does deserve a step-up in competition, but this whole "everybody is ducking me" thing isn't a testimony to his greatness.
And yet people are talking about him like he's the next TJ Dillashaw or something
TJ D. Who the F is he? Face of ufc ?30 years old; 6 Years pro
7 fights in the UFC against prelim level fighters
Only 2 finishes
Mediocre wrestling heavy style that isn't exciting
And yet people are talking about him like he's the next TJ Dillashaw or something
Emil Meek isn't really "prelim level". He got into the UFC after starching longtime hype job Rousimar Palhares in like a minute and had some hype behind himself.
Usman's a beast.
My point is resume isn't the only way to measure POTENTIAL in an athlete.
Yes he has a lot to prove, but to put it simply he just looks really good
Khabib hasn't fought any of the top 3 guys at lightweight, so do you consider him a typical top 5 guy? Or do you see he's obviously special, and just hasn't been able to prove himself against the likes of Lee, Conor, Tony.
Again, you're comparing apples to oranges.
Usman isn't even undefeated in the UFC, let alone 25-0.
And in those wins Khabib has at least beaten multiple top 15 guys like Barboza, Johnson, Iaquinta, RDA
I trust resume alot more than the "eye test" because at the end of the day, wins and losses are what matter
I'm not saying he's Khabib, but Khabib is an example of what I'm saying
You just don't have the balls to make a prediction on someone dude, it's not 100%, resume is 100%
There's a point in every fighters career that you can make arguments against their resume, leaving you unable to comment on anyones talent unless they're in the latter stages of their career as I said.
I dont get the darren till hype. barely beats guys dispite being bigger. refuses to fight the american wrestlers like Usman, who everyone knows ruins europeans and own UFC.
I get usman. He has all the characteristics of a fighter and no one wants to fight him.
I don't make predictions on unproven fighters because I've seen too many hype jobs never amount.
Roger Huerta, Brandon Thatch, Erick Silva, Will Brooks, Hector Lombard, Brandon Vera, Sokodjou, Houston Alexander, Uriah Hall, the list goes on and on
He was on a four fight submission win streak at the time with his most recent win being via kimura over Jake Shields. It was a phenomenal win for the then-unknown Meek, who then won his UFC debut vs veteran Jordan Mein. The dominating loss to Usman probably drops him back to the prelims but he's not just some scrub.I mean Palhares 1-3-1 in his last 5 fights since he lost to Emil against really weak competition. Palhares has always struggled with good strikers. There's a reason all of Rousimar's losses are usually quick KO's
So yeah I would definitely consider Meek a prelim level guy at this point
30 years old; 6 Years pro
7 fights in the UFC against prelim level fighters
Only 2 finishes
Mediocre wrestling heavy style that isn't exciting
And yet people are talking about him like he's the next TJ Dillashaw or something
I trust resume alot more than the "eye test" because at the end of the day, wins and losses are what matter
The Houston Alexander hype was through the roof. People were fantasizing about him vs prime Rampage lol.None of those guys were ever that big of a deal except maybe Vera
If you don't want to ever make predictions on anyone because you've been heartbroken too many times fine, but don't go around shitting on all of them saying their resumes suck right at the beginning of their UFC run in the top ten.
Ya'pessimist brah