USADA mistakes Tom Lawlor for Robbie Lawler

theBLADE1 said:
I think you're missing my point.

As far as I know at least, there is no indication that Tom or Robbie didn't make known their daily routines. I'm talking if USADA got the two different specimens mixed up because their name is similar. That just reeks of incompetence.
Click to expand...
I think you misread what Lawlor posted. It's entirely about whereabouts info, it wouldn't be sent out unless a) one of them didn't submit it or b) Tom retired and they didn't notice, but got his name confused with Robbie. There's no reason at all to think that they got samples from the two fighters mixed up, where are you getting that from?
 
Maybe filthy was caught doing his ruthless impression at home
 
LiveFreeorDie said:
brain fart and a bottle of piss could end a career.
Click to expand...
the procedure for someone sending out an email is not the same as the procedure for collecting, transportation, analysis and reporting of samples.
 
theBLADE1 said:
. I'm talking if USADA got the two different specimens mixed up because their name is similar. That just reeks of incompetence.
Click to expand...

its fine, specimins arent labelled, transported, stored or handled with names on.

its all code-numbers
 
LiveFreeorDie said:
They have one thing in common, a human.
Click to expand...

no, they dont really.

the collection/transportation/analysis/reporting logging is basically computerised.

its really pretty simple.

Collection - computer tells the dco who is going to be tested, its then all done by serial numbers, robbie provides urine sample, the sample collection container has a serial number. DCO can only enters serial number into current test session. there is no possible way on earth that that serial number could be entered under tom, because the DCO unless they happened to be testing tom on the very same day, at the very same time, at the very same location, they wouldnt even have access to tom's session data.

Transportation - all serial numbers, no names.

Analysis - all serial numbers, no names

Reporting - all serial numbers, no names.



Compare that to say, sending an email for wherabouts data..

System flags that Lawler has starting doing his wherabouts filings but hasnt pressed submit. Person checking through filings spots this and thinks "oh, must remember to send Lawler an email". Goes to email program, composes email, has a brain fart and calls Tom robbie by mistake.
 
a part of me hopes they got the wrong Lawler just to watch the shit storm that would happen.
 
Henry Venda said:
And Jones used dick pills, not peds to get like this:

Yes very legitimate org so trustworthy.

View attachment 211861
Click to expand...

Am I the only one who finds no big deal with this photo? on the left you have a guy who is out of shape between camps and never spent any time doing serious strength training and then on the right a guy who dedicated himself to more or less only lifting while he was off from fighting
 
USADA is still tryin to track down Giblert Melendez and Anderson Aldo
 
dimspace said:
no, they dont really.

the collection/transportation/analysis/reporting logging is basically computerised.

its really pretty simple.

Collection - computer tells the dco who is going to be tested, its then all done by serial numbers, robbie provides urine sample, .
Click to expand...
Like I said, a human is involved.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,988
Messages
55,459,622
Members
174,787
Latest member
Freddie556

Share this page

Back
Top