- Joined
- May 12, 2015
- Messages
- 14,120
- Reaction score
- 4,310
I have studied this for 15 years. Read tons of books (from both sides). Watched countless documentaries (from both sides) and watched an enormous amount of unbiased footage of all the events on my own. To me it's not a matter of conspiracy theories or truthers. To me, it's completely asinine that anyone could believe the official story. Open your eyes. Use your brain. Think.
It's funny to me, that us "truthers" are considered tin foil hat wearing idiots, when we have actually studied this topic. Looked at it from all angles. Listened to experts. Yes EXPERTS. Pilots, architecs, engineers, controled demolition experts, etc... Yet, others just watched Fox News and took their word for it. Who's the idiots?
Yep. I agree 100%. It's crazy that there are people on here that DON'T question the official story. It makes no sense.
So This:
Turned to this:
Yet this:
Became this:
Totally makes sense!
Wanna know what else makes sense? That the 3 towers defied physics and was able to crush through 47 floors and 110 floors of steel and concrete at near free fall speeds.
For anyone that doesn't know, free fall speeds means the rate at which something falls without ANY resistance. Here's the definition:
"In Newtonian physics, free fall is any motion of a body where gravity is the only force acting upon it. In the context of general relativity, where gravitation is reduced to a space-time curvature, a body in free fall has no force acting on it and moves along a geodesic."
So 110 floors (wtc 1&2) or 47 floors (wtc7) was able to fall where gravity is the only force acting upon it, not being slower down by steel, concrete, office furniture, etc... for the pancake effect? Ok.
The NIST report is so flawed and full of shit. They made the computer program that showed how WTC7 collapsed. . Let me repeat that so people can let that sink in for a second... NIST created the program that they showed how it happened. And when other scientists, architects and engineers wanted to see/use the program to test for themselves, NIST would not allow them to.
Imagine if Jon Jones made a computer program to show how he did not use steroids.
15 years of casually reading conspiracy websites and watching shitty YouTube videos, but not a single structural engineering course or book.
Educate yourself! Open your eyes! See the truth! Just don't actually read anything worth a shit like a college textbook or real resource on the subject!
- Entertheninja
What's funny is how you even admit it wasn't free fall speeds. It was near free fall. Which means it met resistance on the way down.
What's even more hilarious is that you absolutely cannot tell anyone what the rate of descent should be during a fire caused collapse according to your theory. Because you don't know physics and engineering and you're using shitty science. You're just parroting basic bullshit that's been debunked by more knowledgeable people.
You really showed your cards when you posted the worst angled photo possible to describe the WTC 7 fires. They were multistory and raged for 7 hours without any serious efforts to stop the fire. This is how disingenuous your comments are.
Last edited: